GAO Liang-tian, WANG Jian-wei, WANG Qing, JIA Bin, WANG Yong-kui, SHI Li. NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD FOR MOTIONS OF THE ICEBREAKER IN LEVEL ICE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(1): 227-237. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.10.0785
Citation: GAO Liang-tian, WANG Jian-wei, WANG Qing, JIA Bin, WANG Yong-kui, SHI Li. NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD FOR MOTIONS OF THE ICEBREAKER IN LEVEL ICE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(1): 227-237. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.10.0785

NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD FOR MOTIONS OF THE ICEBREAKER IN LEVEL ICE

More Information
  • Received Date: October 16, 2017
  • Revised Date: January 15, 2018
  • To study the motion characteristics of the icebreaker in level ice and the failure mode of sea ice, a six-degrees-of-freedom kinetic equation is established including ice loads, open water resistance, propeller thrust and rudder forces. Considering the influence of the elastic bending of sea ice on icebreaking force, the secondary fracture and the dynamic bending failure criterion of sea ice are introduced, so that a more accurate and perfect ship-ice dynamic contact model is proposed. Based on these theories, the direct sailing and the turning motions of the Swedish icebreaker, Tor Viking Ⅱ, are simulated in level ice. The numerical simulation results are compared with full-scale trial data to verify its rationality. The results indicate that the simulated trajectory is consistent with the real trajectory. The relative error of the maximum turning diameter is only 3.32%. Therefore, the numerical simulation method established in this paper is able to authentically simulate the motions of the icebreaker in level ice.
  • [1]
    Ettema R, Sharifi M B, Georgakakos K P, et al. Chaos in continuous-mode icebreaking[J]. Cold Regions Science & Technology, 1991, 19(2):131-144.
    [2]
    Izumiyama K, Kitagawa H, Koyama K, et al. On the interaction between a conical structure and ice sheet[C]//11st International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC), 1991:155-166.
    [3]
    Liu R, Xue Y, Lu X, et al. Simulation of ship navigation in ice rubble based on peridynamics[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 148:286-298.
    [4]
    黄焱, 关湃, 禹沐. 破冰船航行状态在海冰作用下的运动响应分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2015, 45(2):149-160. Huang Yan, Guan Pai, Yu Mu. Study of the sailing's moving responses of an icebreaker in ice[J]. Mathematics in Practice & Theory, 2015, 45(2):149-160. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    Kashtelyan V I, Poznyak I I, Ryvlin A Y. Resistance of ice to ship movement[J]. Sudostroyeniye (Soviet Shipbuilding)[USSR], 1968.
    [6]
    Lindqvist G. A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships[C]//10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC), 1989:722-735.
    [7]
    Varsta P. On the mechanics of ice load on ships in level ice in the Baltic Sea[J]. 1983(8).
    [8]
    Wang S. A dynamic model for breaking pattern of level ice by conical structures[J]. 2001(156):2+6-94.
    [9]
    Su B, Riska K, Moan T. A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice[J]. Cold Regions Science & Technology, 2010, 60(3):177-188.
    [10]
    Tan X, Su B, Riska K, et al. A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice-ship interaction[J]. Cold Regions Science & Technology, 2013, 92(8):1-16.
    [11]
    周昭明, 盛子寅, 冯悟时. 多用途货船的操纵性预报计算[J]. 船舶工程, 1983(6):21-29. Zhou Zhaoming, Sheng Ziyin, Feng Wushi. On maneuverability prediction for multipurpose cargo ship[J]. Ship Engineering, 1983(6):21-29. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    Bertram V. Practical ship hydrodynamics[M]. Oxford, UK:Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012:177-203.
    [13]
    盛振邦, 刘应中. 船舶原理. 下册[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2005:304-332. Sheng Zhenbang, Liu Yingzhong. Principle of naval architecture. Vol. 2[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2005:304-332. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    Haines E. Point in polygon strategies[J]. Graphics Gems IV, 1994:24-46.
    [15]
    Zhou Q, Peng H, Qiu W. Numerical investigations of ship-ice interaction and maneuvering performance in level ice[J]. Cold Regions Science & Technology, 2016, 122(1):36-49.
    [16]
    Riska K. Models of ice-structure contact for engineering applications[J]. Studies in Applied Mechanics, 1995, 42(06):77-103.
    [17]
    Kerr A D. The bearing capacity of floating ice plates subjected to static or quasi-static loads[J]. Journal of Glaciology, 1975, 17(76):229-268.
    [18]
    Tan X, Su B, Riska K, et al. The effect of heave, pitch and roll motions to ice performance of ships[C]//Iahr International Symposium on Ice, 2012:1080-1093.
    [19]
    Valanto P. The icebreaking problem in two dimensions:experiments and theory[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 1992, 36(4):299-316.
    [20]
    武文华, 于佰杰, 许宁, 等. 海冰与锥体抗冰结构动力作用的数值模拟[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(11):192-196. Wu Wenhua, Yu Baijie, Xu Ning, et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic ice action on conical structure[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(11):192-196. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    王刚, 武文华, 岳前进. 锥体接触宽度对冰排弯曲破坏模式影响的有限元分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(1):235-240. Wang Gang, Wu Wenhua, Yue Qianjin. FEM analysis on ice-bending failure mode with width effect of ice-cone interaction[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(1):235-240. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    Di S, Xue Y, Wang Q, et al. Discrete element simulation of ice loads on narrow conical structures[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 146(12):282-297.
    [23]
    Riska K, Leiviskä T, Nyman T, et al. Ice performance of the Swedish multi-purpose icebreaker Tor Viking Ⅱ[C]//16st International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC), 2001:849-866.
  • Related Articles

    [1]DI Shao-cheng, WANG Qing, XUE Yan-zhuo, LI Jia-lin. MANOEUVRABILITY ANALYSIS OF AN ICEBREAKER BASED ON DISCRETE ELEMENT METHO[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(11): 249-256. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.09.0698
    [2]SHI Chu, LUO Yu, HU Zhi-qiang. NON-LINEAR BURGERS' SEA-ICE MODEL CONGSIDERING DAMAGE EFFECTS AND ITS NUMERICAL APPLICATION[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(7): 249-256. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.03.0217
    [3]TAO Shan-shan, DONG Sheng. INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF RETURN SEA ICE THICKNESS IN THE NORTHERN AREAR OF BOHAI SEA BASED ON MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(7): 294-298. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.04.0250
    [4]SONG Bo, QI Fu-qiang. THE EFFECT OF DISTANCE BETWEEN SEA ICE AND PIER ON DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF PIER STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(2): 174-181. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0474
    [5]JI Shun-ying, DI Shao-cheng, LI Zheng, BI Xiang-jun. DISCRETE ELEMENT MODELLING OF INTERACTION BETWEEN SEA ICE AND VERTICAL OFFSHORE STRUCTURES[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 463-469. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0417
    [6]LI Zhi-jun, JIA Qing, WANG Guo-yu, DONG Ji-wu, ZHANG Qiang, LI Guang-wei. PHYSICAL SIMULATION OF ICE FLOE IMPACT FORCES ON PILE STRUCTURES OF WHARFS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(03): 169-173,.
    [7]LI Zhi-jun, DONG Ji-wu, LU Zhi-qiang, CHENG Ji-feng, LI Guang-wei. PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS AND SIMULATION OF SEA ICE FORCE ON PILE STRUCTURES IN PORTS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(3): 212-217.
    [8]WU Wen-hua, YU Bai-jie, XU Ning, YUE Qian-jin. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC ICE ACTION ON CONICAL STRUCTURE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(11): 192-196.
    [9]LI Zhi-jun, Devinder S Sodhi, LU Peng. DISTRIBUTION OF ICE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA OF BOHAI[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(6): 167-172.
    [10]Chen Xing, Xu Jizu. A VISCOPLASTIC CREEP MODEL OF SEA ICE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 1993, 10(4): 52-57.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 王祥,胡冰,刘璐,季顺迎. 冰区航行船舶冰阻力及六自由度运动响应的离散元分析. 工程力学. 2023(04): 243-256 . 本站查看
    2. 仝哲,宋明,袁巍,王嘉豪. 极地船舶层冰阻力及运动响应数值预报. 船舶工程. 2023(12): 46-50+74 .
    3. 王帅霖,刘社文,季顺迎. 基于GPU并行的锥体导管架平台结构冰激振动DEM-FEM耦合分析. 工程力学. 2019(10): 28-39 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (544) PDF downloads (111) Cited by(12)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return