YANG Jun-fen, CHEN Lei, CHENG Jin-peng, ZHAN Yu-hao, YAN Xi-feng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF A NEW TYPE OF FULLY ASSEMBLED BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(12): 75-86. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.08.0582
Citation: YANG Jun-fen, CHEN Lei, CHENG Jin-peng, ZHAN Yu-hao, YAN Xi-feng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF A NEW TYPE OF FULLY ASSEMBLED BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(12): 75-86. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.08.0582

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF A NEW TYPE OF FULLY ASSEMBLED BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS

More Information
  • Received Date: August 02, 2016
  • Revised Date: December 03, 2016
  • This paper presents a new type of joints connecting square steel tube column and H beam, which are fabricated with full bolts. In order to study the seismic performance of the joints, the quasi static test of six 1:2 specimen were carried out under cyclic loads. The effects of axial compression ratio, bending resistance, shear bolt pre-tension, groove shape steel thickness, dog bone connection and other parameters on the failure mode, hysteretic behavior and ductility of the joints were analyzed. The results show that within a certain range (0.2~0.4), as the axial compression ratio increases, the ultimate bearing capacity of the joint becomes slightly lower, but the energy dissipation capacity and ductility are increased; as the pre-tension of the shear bolt decreases, the ultimate bearing capacity of the joints, the energy dissipation capacity and the ductility coefficient are reduced; as the plate thickness of the groove shaped steel decreases, the bearing capacity and the relative angle of the joint become larger, but the energy consumption is reduced; as the pre-tension of the anti-bending bolt decreases, the ultimate bearing capacity of the joint is increased, but the energy dissipation capacity and the ductility coefficient are reduced; although tearing occurs at the weakened position of beam flange in the dog bone connection in loading stage, joints exhibit good ductility, energy dissipation capacity and stable stiffness degradation performance. The story drift ductility ratios is μ=2~2.66, elastic limit of story drift ration is φy=0.0208~0.0327, elastic-plastic limit of story drift rotation ratio is φu=0.0486~0.079, and relative plastic rotation limit of beam-column is θu=0.05~0.087. The equivalent viscous damping coefficient is he=0.287~0.45. The test results show that the joint has good seismic performance.
  • [1]
    张爱林, 赵亮, 刘学春, 等. 装配式方钢管柱桁架梁节点单调加载试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(增刊2):169-174. Zhang Ailin, Zhao Liang, Liu Xuechun, et al. Monotonic experimental study of prefabricated square tubular column to truss beam connections[J]. 2014, 47(Suppl 2):169-174. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    Gholami M, Deylami A, Tehranizadeh M. Seismic performance of flange plate connections between steel beams and box columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 84(5):36-48.
    [3]
    周天华, 聂少锋, 卢林枫, 等. 带内隔板的方钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点设计研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2005, 26(5):23-29. Zhou Tianhua, Nie Shaofeng, Lu Linfeng, et al. Design of concrete filled steel square tubular column and steel beam joint with internal diaphragms[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2005, 26(5):23-29. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    王来, 王铁成, 邓芃. 方钢管混凝土框架内隔板节点抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2005, 25(1):76-80. Wang Lai, Wang Tiecheng, Deng Peng. Experimental research on seismic performances of joint reinforce with inner ring stiffener of concrete-filled square tubular frame[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2005, 25(1):76-80. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    聂建国, 秦凯, 肖岩. 方钢管混凝土柱节点的试验研究及非线性有限元分析[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(11):99-109. Nie Jianguo, Qin Kai, Xiao Yan. Experimental investigation and nonlinear finite element analysis on the behavior of concrete-filled square steel tubular column connections[J]. Engineering Mechanics 2006, 23(11):99-109. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    王先铁, 郝际平, 周观根. 方钢管混凝土边柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(3):120-127. Wang Xiantie, Hao Jiping, Zhou Guan'gen. Experimental studies on seismic behavior of connection for concrete-filled square steel tube edge column[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2008, 29(3):120-127. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    王万祯, 王伟焘, 谢光杰. 隔板贯通式箱型柱-H型钢梁节点循环加载试验和破坏机理分析[J]. 工程力学, 2015, 32(4):93-102. Wang Wanzhen, Wang Weitao, Xie Guangjie. Reversed loading tests and fracture mechanism of joints of steel box column and H-section steel beam with through disaphragms[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(4):93-102. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    李自林, 张聪, 薛江, 等. 钢管混凝土组合结构全螺栓隔板贯通节点的抗震性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(11):116-123. Li Zilin, Zhang Cong, Xue Jiang, et al. Experimental studies on all-bolts and diaphragm-through joint's aseismic behavior of concrete-filled steel tubular structure[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(11):116-123. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    王静峰, 张琳, 戴阳. 半刚性钢管混凝土框架梁柱端板连接抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(11):13-21. Wang Jingfeng, Zhang Lin, Dai Yang. Seismic experimental study of end plate connections for semi-rigid concrete-filled steel tubular frames[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(11):13-21. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    何益斌, 黄频, 冷巧娟, 等. 方钢管混凝土柱穿心高强螺栓-端板节点抗剪承载力研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2010, 40(4):83-86. He Yibin, Huang Pin, Leng Qiaojuan, et al. Study on shear carrying capacity of through high strength bolts end plate connect for concrete filled square steel tube column[J]. Building Structure, 2010, 40(4):83-86. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    马尤苏夫, 王先铁, 周清汉, 等. 穿芯高强螺栓-端板节点方钢管混凝土框架抗震性能数值分析[J]. 工程力学, 2015, 32(2):154-162. Ma Yousufu, Wang Xiantie, Zhou Qinghan, et al. Numerical analysis of the seismic behavior of a square concrete-filled steel tube frame with through bolt-end plate joints[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(2):154-162. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    吴院生. 冷弯方管柱-H型钢梁节点连接承载力研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2005. Wu Yuansheng. The research of bearing capacity about cold-formed box column to H-beam connection joints[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan Institute of Technology, 2005. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    李国强, 段炼, 陆烨, 等. H型钢梁与矩形钢管柱外伸式端板单向螺栓连接节点承载力试验与理论研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(9):91-100. Li Guoqiang, Duan Lian, Lu Ye, et al. Experimental and theoretical study of bearing capacity for extended endplate connections between rectangular tubular columns and H-shaped beams with single direction bolts[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(9):91-100. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    李黎明, 陈以一, 李宁, 等. 新型外套管式梁柱节点多因素分析研究[J]. 工程力学:2009, 26(11):60-67. Li Liming, Chen Yiyi, Li Ning, et al. Multiple factor analysis on mechanical performance of outer-shell connection[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(11):60-67. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    张玉芬, 张冬芳, 赵均海. 复式钢管混凝土柱与H形钢梁连接节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(9):40-48. Zhang Yufen, Zhang Dongfang, Zhao Junhai. Experimental study on seismic behavior of connection between composite CFST column and H-shaped steel beam[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(9):40-48. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    Yang Chao, Yang Junfen, Su Mingzhou, et al. Numerical study on seismic behaviours of ConXL biaxial moment connection[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 121:185-201.
    [17]
    Alireza Rezaeian, Majid Jamal-Omidi, Farhood Shahidi. Seismic behavior of ConXL rigid connection in box-columns not filled with concrete[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 97(C):79-104.
    [18]
    Farhood Shahidi, Alireza Rezaeian, Majid Jamal-Omidi, et al. Investigation of the ConXL moment connection cyclic behavior in box columns without filling concrete with different arrangement of collar bolts[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2015, 24(5):317-350.
    [19]
    GB 50017-2003, 钢结构设计规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2003. GB 50017-2003, Code for design of steel structures[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    GB 50011-2010, 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB 50011-2010, Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    JGJ 82-2011, 钢结构高强螺栓连接技术规程[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011. JGJ 82-2011, Technical specification for high strength bolt connections of steel structures[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    GB 50205-2001, 钢结构工程施工质量验收规范[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2002. GB 50205-2001, Code for acceptance of construction quality of steel structures[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    GB/T 2975-1998, 钢及钢产品力学性能试样取样位置及试样制备[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1999. GB/T 2975-1998, Steel and steel product:location and preparation of test pieces for mechanical testing[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 1999. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    GB/T 228.1-2010, 金属材料室温拉伸试验:第1部分:室温试验方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2011. GB/T 228.1-2010, Metallic materials:tensile testing:part 1:method of test at room temperature[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
    [25]
    Eurocode 3:Design of steel structures, Part 1.1 General rules and rules for buildings[S]. European Committee for Standardization, 1992.
    [26]
    JGJ/T 101-2015, 建筑抗震试验方法规程[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015. JGJ/T 101-2015, Specification of testing methods for earthquake resistant building[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    唐九如. 钢筋混凝土框架节点抗震[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社, 1999:49-56. Tang Jiuru. Seismic design of building[M]. Nanjing:Dongnan University Press, 1999:49-56. (in Chinese)
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 李国强,蒋蕴涵,陈琛,王苑佐,王彦博. 工字形钢梁-矩形钢管柱单向螺栓节点抗弯承载力理论计算方法. 土木工程学报. 2024(02): 35-45 .
    2. 董静,白宇航,刘云贺,丛潇然,申长岭. 新型装配式框架节点地震损伤性能研究. 振动与冲击. 2024(18): 267-277 .
    3. 韦俊,郑东东,郭宏超,王振山. 基于数值模拟的带C形悬臂段装配式梁柱节点抗震性能研究. 应用力学学报. 2024(05): 1140-1149 .
    4. 李霞镇,任海青,李贤军,徐康,钟永,郝晓峰. 重组竹螺栓连接节点承载能力计算分析. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2022(04): 78-86 .
    5. 范俊伟,杨璐,王元清,班慧勇. 方钢管柱可拆卸螺栓拼接节点轴向力学性能研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(10): 307-319 .
    6. 范俊伟,杨璐,班慧勇. 新型单边拧紧高强度螺栓摩擦型连接扭矩系数及抗剪性能试验研究. 工程力学. 2021(01): 119-128 . 本站查看
    7. 丁克伟,李为. 一种新型装配式梁柱节点力学性能试验研究. 四川建筑科学研究. 2021(01): 31-41 .
    8. 丁克伟,陈伟. 装配式混凝土梁柱节点抗震性能试验和恢复力模型研究. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 51-60 .
    9. 马倩. 高轴压比的装配式钢结构抗震性能研究. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2021(04): 75-80 .
    10. 张晶,程欣,雷宏刚. 带支撑的方钢管柱与桁架梁十字形节点试验研究. 建筑钢结构进展. 2021(09): 11-18 .
    11. 李霞镇,任海青,李贤军,钟永,徐康,郝晓峰. 重组竹-钢夹板螺栓连接节点承载特性和破坏形态. 林业科学. 2021(08): 157-166 .
    12. 郝际平,黄育琪,樊春雷,薛强. 带约束拉杆壁式钢管混凝土柱拟静力试验研究. 工程力学. 2021(12): 39-48 . 本站查看
    13. 何明胜,刘礼,王京,陈立福. 新型全螺栓连接钢框架抗震性能试验研究. 建筑钢结构进展. 2020(01): 19-25 .
    14. 陈伟宏,吴胜豪,王晨阳,崔双双,梁业强. PC结构混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究. 混凝土与水泥制品. 2020(07): 59-63 .
    15. 姜文,翟伟,杨金虎,杨俊芬,曲凯,张文喆. 装配式环槽铆钉梁柱节点力学性能数值分析. 建筑结构. 2020(S2): 452-464 .
    16. 崔兆彦,徐明,陈忠范,王飞. 重组竹钢夹板螺栓连接承载力试验研究. 工程力学. 2019(01): 96-103+118 . 本站查看
    17. 叶冬晨,陈以一. 基于分块组合法的多孔板塑性极限状态分析. 工程力学. 2019(06): 36-48 . 本站查看
    18. 杨俊芬,程锦鹏,翟伟,张文喆. 内填脱硫石膏砌块墙体的新型装配式钢框架抗震性能研究. 工程力学. 2019(06): 147-156 . 本站查看
    19. 左恒,陶忠,刘贝. 新型法兰盘外环板式钢节点抗震性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2019(11): 82-86+81 .
    20. 操礼林,郭良梦,于国军,李爱群. 新型外套筒式梁柱装配节点的抗震性能研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2019(06): 1399-1410 .
    21. 马少春,鲍鹏,姜忻良,李娜娜. 装配式建筑墙板抗震实验研究. 河南大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 717-722 .
    22. 王萌,柯小刚,吴照章. 可更换延性耗能连接组件的钢框架节点抗震性能研究. 工程力学. 2018(12): 151-163 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(37)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (432) PDF downloads (95) Cited by(59)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return