藏式石砌体受压应力-应变全曲线特征研究

滕东宇; 杨娜

doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.08.0647

藏式石砌体受压应力-应变全曲线特征研究

滕东宇^1,2,
杨娜^1,

1.
北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院, 北京 100044;
2.
中科建(北京)工程技术研究院有限公司, 北京 100000

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目（51778045）；北京自然科学基金重点项目（8151003）；国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目（51422801）

详细信息

作者简介:
滕东宇(1986-),男,吉林人,工程师,博士生,主要从事古建筑和装配式建筑研究工作(E-mail:tengdongyu@foxmail.com).

通讯作者:
杨娜(1974-),女,辽宁人,教授,工学博士,博导,主要从事钢结构和古建筑研究工作(E-mail:nyang@bjtu.edu.cn).

中图分类号: TU363;TU317.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 476
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 62
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-08-23
- 修回日期: 2018-02-04
- 刊出日期: 2018-11-28

RESEARCH ON THE FEATURES OF COMPLETE STRESS-STRAIN CURVES OF TIBETAN-STYLE STONE MASONRY UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOAD

TENG Dong-yu^1,2,
YANG Na^1,

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
2.
China Science Construction(Beijing) Institute of Engineering Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100000, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究藏式石砌体轴心受压下的变形特征和损伤机理，对2组共8个三石叠放的棱柱体试件进行了轴心受压试验。2组试件分别反映普通毛石砌筑风格和藏式风格。得到了试件的开裂及破坏形态、变形特征和受压全过程应力-应变曲线。试验结果表明，藏式石砌体具有阶段性变形和损伤特征，应力-应变曲线与其他类型砌体存在差异。根据试验现象和试验数据提出了藏式石砌体轴心受压的开裂前应力-应变曲线本构关系表达式，采用两段式二次多项式来表达。该表达式与实验结果吻合度较好。对试验的适用性进行了探讨，提出了对后续试验的建议。
- 石砌体 /
- 抗压试验 /
- 破坏模式 /
- 本构关系 /
- 棱柱体 /
- 应力-应变曲线
Abstract: To find out the deformation characteristics and damage mechanism of compressed Tibetan-style stone masonry, an experimental research was carried out on 2 groups (8 specimens in all) stacked prisms under axial compression. One group simulates normal rubble stone masonry and the other simulates the Tibetan-style stone masonry. The crack and deformation characteristics, the failure modes, and the complete stress-strain curves were obtained. The research results show that the Tibetan-style stone masonry have staged deformation and damage characteristics, and the complete stress-strain curve is different from other types of masonry. Based on the experimental phenomena and the experimental data, the compressive constitutive relationship before cracking of the Tibetan-style stone masonry is proposed. The equations can be expressed by a two-segment curve with quadratic polynomials. The constitutive relationship is close to the experimental results. The applicability of prism testing was discussed. Suggestions for follow-up tests were proposed.
- stone masonry /
- compressive test /
- failure mode /
- constitutive relationship /
- prism /
- stress-stain curve

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	施楚贤. 砌体结构理论与设计[M]. 第三版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社. 2014:50-53. Shi Chuxian. The theory and design of masonry strcture[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2014:50-53. (In Chinese)
[2]	黄靓, 王辉, 陈胜云. 低强度砂浆灌孔砌块砌体抗压性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(10):157-161. Huang Liang, Wang Hui, Chen Shengyun. Experimental research on compressive behavior of grouted block masonry with low-strength mortar[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(10):157-161. (in Chinese).
[3]	Page A W, Shrive N G. A critical assessment of compression tests for hollow block masonry[J]. Masonry International, 1988, 5(2):64-70.
[4]	Vasconcelos. Experimental investigations on the mechanics of stone masonry:Characterization of granites and behavior of ancient masonry shear walls[D]. Braga, Portugal:University of Minho. 2005.
[5]	Vasconcelos G, Lourenço P B. Experimental characterization of stone masonry in shear and compression[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(11):3337-3345.
[6]	VenuMadhava Rao K, Reddy B V V, Jagadish K S. Strength characteristics of stone masonry[J]. Materials and Structures, 1997, 30(4):233-237.
[7]	Nart M Naghoj, The effect of height-to-width ratio on the strength of concrete-backed stone masonry prisms[J]. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 2013, 6:261-271.
[8]	Pinho F F S, Lúcio V J G, Baião M F C. Experimental analysis of rubble stone masonry walls strengthened by transverse confinement under compression and compression-shear loadings[J]. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2018, 12(1):91-113.
[9]	Almeida C, Guedes J P, Arêde A, et al. Physical characterization and compression tests of one leaf stone masonry walls[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 30(3340):188-197.
[10]	彭斌, 刘卫东, 杨伟波. 在役历史建筑砌体承重墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(12):112-126. Peng Bin, Liu Weidong, Yang Weibo. Experimental investigation on seismic behaviors of load-bearing masonry walls in in-service historical architecture[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(12):112-126. (in Chinese)
[11]	Aguilar R, Montesinos M, RamírezMechanical E, et al. Testing in adobe bricks and earthen mortar from the archaeological complex of Huaca de la Luna in Perú[C]. Proceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Padova, Italy, 26-30 June 2016.
[12]	ASTM C469/C469M-14, Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson's ratio of concrete in compression[S]. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014.
[13]	GB/T 50129-2011, 砌体基本力学性能试验方法标准[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011. GB/T 50129-2011, Standard of experiment method for mechanical properties of masonry[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2011.
[14]	过镇海, 时旭东. 钢筋混凝土原理和分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2003:19. Guo Zhenhai, Shi Xudong. Reinforced concrete theory and analyse[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2003:19. (in Chinese)
[15]	秦士洪, 倪校军, 曹桓铭, 等. 蒸压粉煤灰砖砌体应力-应变全曲线研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(8):94-100. Qin Shihong, Ni Xiaojun, Cao Hengming, et al. Research on stress-strain in full curves of autoclaved fly ash brick masonry[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31(8):94-100. (in Chinese).
[16]	阿肯江·托呼提, 沙吾列提·拜开依, 曹耿. 土坯砌体单轴受压本构模型研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(12):295-301. Akenjiang TUOHUTI, Sawulet BEKEY, CAO Geng. Study on uniaxial compression constitutive models of adobe masonry[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(12):295-301. (in Chinese)
[17]	JGJ 70-2009, 建筑砂浆基本性能试验方法[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009:10-37. JGJ 70-2009, Standard for test method of basic properties of construction mortar[S]. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2009:10-37. (in Chinese)
[18]	江近仁, 谢君斐. 中国科学院土木建筑研究所报告第2号. 砖石结构研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1956:8-11. Jiang Jinren, Xie Junfei. The report of civil engineering institute of Chinese Academy of Science No. 2. The study of masonry structure[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1956:8-11. (in Chinese)
[19]	梁建国, 洪丽, 肖逸夫, 等. 砖和砂浆的本构关系试验研究[C]. 全国砌体结构领域基本理论与工程应用学术会议, 2012:155-164. Liang Jianguo, Hong Li, Xiao Yifu, et al. Experimental research of stress-strain relationship on brick and mortar[C]. Basic theory and engineering application of masonry structure. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press. 2012:155-164. (in Chinese)
[20]	Naraine K, Sinha S. Model for cyclic compressive behavior of brick masonry[J]. Aci Structural Journal, 1991, 88(5):592-602.
[21]	朱伯龙. 砌体结构设计原理[M]. 上海:同济大学出版社, 1991:13-28. Zhu Bolong. Design principles of masonry structure[M]. Shanghai:Tongji University Press, 1991:13-28. (in Chinese)

施引文献(25)

期刊类型引用(15)

1.	贺鹏，黄选明，滕东宇，黄广华，郝祯，孙嘉伟. 大城砖-传统灰浆砌体力学特性及破坏机理试验研究. 建筑科学. 2025(01): 9-19 . 百度学术
2.	马少春，李泽云，苗长伟，鲍鹏，孔令鹏，王梦. 不同损伤程度下历史建筑青砖抗盐侵蚀性能评价. 河南大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 236-245 . 百度学术
3.	汪源，余文，王艳，黄辉，贾彬，王汝恒. 藏式毛石砌体受压力学性能试验与数值模拟研究. 建筑结构. 2024(08): 113-119 . 百度学术
4.	梁建国，赵一帆，陈大川，徐培军，李振华，王高峰. 注浆加固毛石砌体的受压性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2023(24): 136-140 . 百度学术
5.	崔玥，杨娜. 藏式山地古建筑结构特征及抗震性能. 建筑结构学报. 2023(S2): 20-31 . 百度学术
6.	白凡，杨娜，常鹏，旦增格桑，旦增卓嘎，滕东宇. 基于模糊层次法的藏式砌体劣化风险权重系数试验标定研究. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2022(02): 158-164 . 百度学术
7.	蒋宇洪，杨娜. 基于RVE单元的石砌体有效模量计算方法. 工程力学. 2022(04): 86-99+256 . 本站查看
8.	汪源，黄辉，贾彬，王汝恒. 传统藏式毛石砌体受压力学性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2022(08): 118-123 . 百度学术
9.	吴芝忠，黄辉，汪源，贾彬，王汝恒. 藏式毛石砌体抗压强度对其弹性模量和峰值应变预测. 科学技术与工程. 2022(25): 11130-11136 . 百度学术
10.	丛宇，谭森龙，王佳豪. 藏式建筑震害分析及加固方法研究. 山西建筑. 2022(24): 24-28+51 . 百度学术
11.	刘威，杨娜，白凡，常鹏. 基于环境激励的藏式古城墙动力特性研究. 土木工程学报. 2021(04): 45-56 . 百度学术
12.	孙宏伟，贾艳艳，王少杰，倪韦斌，殷志凯. 现存干砌毛石墙抗震性能试验与原貌保护策略. 工程抗震与加固改造. 2021(02): 117-124 . 百度学术
13.	常鹏，吴楠楠，王钊，杨娜，白凡. 藏式山地结构有限元模型修正及动力可靠度分析. 土木工程学报. 2020(06): 13-20+41 . 百度学术
14.	蒋宇洪，杨娜，白凡. 基于RVE单元的藏式古建石砌体均质化研究. 工程力学. 2020(07): 110-124 . 本站查看
15.	郑文忠，敖日格乐，王英，黄文宣. 碱矿渣陶粒混凝土砌块砌体受压本构关系. 工程力学. 2020(10): 218-227 . 本站查看