基于地震损失风险钢筋混凝土框架结构弯矩增大系数评估

王树和; 张举兵

doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.11.0865

基于地震损失风险钢筋混凝土框架结构弯矩增大系数评估

北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院, 北京 100083

详细信息

作者简介:
张举兵(1974-),男,江苏人,副教授,博士,主要从事结构工程研究(E-mail:zjb_www@163.com).

通讯作者:
王树和(1966-),男,天津人,副教授,博士,主要从事结构抗震和防灾减灾研究(E-mail:wangshuhe2001@163.com).

中图分类号: TU375.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 271
- HTML全文浏览量: 28
- PDF下载量: 49
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-11-06
- 修回日期: 2017-03-27
- 刊出日期: 2018-03-24

EVALUATION OF MOMENT MAGNIFYING COEFFICIENTS OF RC STRUCTURES BASED ON THE SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD

School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 损失是表征结构性能的综合指标。为了从损失风险的角度评估现行抗震规范钢筋混凝土框架弯矩增大系数的取值，基于地震风险评估框架FEMA P-58，给出了基于结构整体易损性分析的地震损失计算方法。设计了4个弯矩增大系数分别为1.1、1.3、1.5、1.7的钢筋混凝土框架结构，采用增量动力时程分析方法，得出了结构的易损性曲线和易损性矩阵，按照地震烈度概率模型，给出了所在场地各种烈度地震发生的概率，计算了每个结构在50年和1年内的经济损失和人员伤亡损失。结果表明，地震损失风险随强柱弱梁系数增大而减小，50年总经济损失比介于0.08~0.12，人员损伤率介于4.85×10^-4~1.12×10^-3。按照目前规范取值设计的结构地震损失风险处于可接受范围内。
- 混凝土框架 /
- 弯矩增大系数 /
- 地震风险 /
- 损失 /
- 易损性曲线
Abstract: Loss is a comprehensive index of structural seismic performance. In order to evaluate the rationality of moment magnifying coefficients of concrete frame structures in the current national seismic code, a method of seismic loss calculation was proposed. The method was based on structural fragility analysis and the loss calculation frame FEMA P-58, and was from the viewpoint of seismic loss risk. Four reinforced concrete frame structures with moment magnifying coefficients of 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7 were designed. The fragility curves and fragility matrixes were obtained by using the incremental dynamic analysis. According to the seismic intensity probability model, the probability distribution of various seismic intensity of the site was given. The 50-year and annual monetary and human losses of every structure were calculated. The results indicate that the seismic loss risk will decrease with the increase in moment magnifying coefficient. The 50-year total monetary loss ratio ranges between 0.08 and 0.12. The human loss ratio ranges between 4.85×10^-4 and 1.12×10^-3. The seismic loss risk is acceptable if the structure is designed to the current national design code.
- concrete frame /
- moment magnifying coefficients /
- seismic risk /
- loss /
- fragility curves

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	叶列平, 马千里, 缪志伟. 钢筋混凝土框架结构强柱弱梁设计方法的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(12):102-113. Ye Lieping, Ma Qianli, Miao Zhiwei. Study on weak beam-strong column design method of RC frame structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(12):102-113. (in Chinese)
[2]	张耀庭, 马超, 郭宗明, 杜晓菊, 刘昌芳. 不同弯矩增大系数钢筋混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(2):29-37. Zhang Yaoting, Ma Chao, Guo Zongming, Du Xiaoju, Liu Changfang. Seismic fragility analysis for RC frame structures with various moment magnifying coefficients[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(2):29-37. (in Chinese)
[3]	杨红, 孙永炜, 张睿, 白少良. 基于梁铰机制的柱端弯矩增强措施研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(4):64-74. Yang Hong, Sun Yongwei, Zhang Rui, Bai Shaoliang. Study on the moment amplification measures of column ends based on the sideway mechanism[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(4):64-74. (in Chinese)
[4]	蔡健, 周靖, 方小丹. 柱端弯矩增大系数取值对RC框架结构抗震性能影响的评估[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(1):6-14. Cai Jian, Zhou Jing, Fang Xiaodan. Evaluation of influences of various moment magnifying coefficients at column ends of RC frames on seismic performance[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(1):6-14. (in Chinese)
[5]	FEMA. FEMA P-58:Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1-methodology[R]. Washington D C:Federal Emergency Management Agency:2012.
[6]	曾翔, 刘诗璇, 许镇, 等. 基于FEMA-P58方法的校园建筑地震经济损失预测案例分析[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(增刊):113-118. Zeng Xiang, Liu Shixuan, Xu Zhen, et al. Earthquake loss prediction for campus buildings based on FEMA-P58 method:A case study[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(Suppl):113-118. (in Chinese)
[7]	于晓辉, 吕大刚. HAZUS相容的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(3):152-160. Yu Xiaohui, Lü Dagang. HAZUS compatible seismic fragility analysis for RC frame structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(3):152-160. (in Chinese)
[8]	罗文文, 李英民, 韩军. 基于全概率PBEE方法的RC框架结构地震损失分析[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(9):186-194. Luo Wenwen, Li Yingmin, Han Jun. Earthquake loss estimation for RC frames based on PEER-PBEE methodology[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(9):186-194. (in Chinese)
[9]	Dimopoulos A I, Tzimas A S, Karavasilis T L, et al. Probabilistic economic seismic loss estimation in steel buildings using post-tensioned moment-resisting frames and viscous dampers[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016, 45(11):1725-1741.
[10]	Mehrdad S, Mehdi B, Mehran S, Afshin M. Assessment of seismic risks in code conforming reinforced concrete frames[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98:14-28.
[11]	马宏旺, 吕西林, 陈晓宝. 建筑结构地震直接经济损失估计方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(3):38-43. Ma Hongwang, Lü Xilin, Chen Xiaobao. An estimation method for the direct losses of earthquake-induced building damages[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(3):38-43. (in Chinese)
[12]	羡丽娜, 何政. 不同CMR的RC框架结构地震损失分析[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(12):155-163. Xian Li'na, He Zheng. Earthquake loss analysis of RC frame structures with different collapse margin ratios[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(12):155-163. (in Chinese)
[13]	李刚, 程耿东. 基于性能的结构抗震设计:理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004:2-131. Li Gang, Cheng Gengdong. Performance-based seismic design of structures:Theory, methods and applications[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2004:2-131. (in Chinese)
[14]	Applied Technology Council (ATC). Earthquake damaged evaluation data for California[R]. Rep. No. ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1985.
[15]	Mackie K. Fragility-based seismic decision making for highway overpass bridge[D]. Berkeley:University of California, Berkeley, 2005:1-337.
[16]	吴巧云, 朱宏平, 樊剑. 基于性能的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(9):117-124. Wu Qiaoyun, Zhu Hongping, Fan Jian. Performancebased seismic fragility analysis of RC frame structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(9):117-124. (in Chinese)
[17]	National Institute of Building Science. HAZUS99 user's manual[R]. Washington D C:Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1999:199-208.
[18]	Xie L, Ma Y. Studies on performance-based seismic design criterion[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2002, 24(2):200-209.
[19]	Gao X. Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration. 1985, 5(3):13-22.
[20]	国家地震局. 中国地震烈度区划图[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1991. China Earthquake Administration. Earthquake intensity zoning map of China[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1991. (in Chinese)
[21]	Fragiadakis M, Lagaros N D, Papadrakakis M. Performance-based multi-objective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost[J]. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 32(1):1-11.
[22]	Wang G Y, Cheng G D, Shao Z M, et al. Optimal fortification intensity and reliability of anti-seismic structures[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1999.
[23]	FEMA. HAZUS-MH MR2 technical manual[R]. FEMA, Washington D C, 2006:43-46.
[24]	GB50011-2010, 建筑结构抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB50011-2010, Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[25]	Shome N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures[D]. Stanford:Stanford University, 1999.
[26]	Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER strong motion database[DB/OL]. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/index.html.California:Berkley,2005.
[27]	Zhi X D, Nie G B, Fan F, Shen S Z. Vulnerability and risk assessment of single-layer reticulated domes subjected to earthquakes[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138(12):1505-1514.

施引文献(10)

期刊类型引用(6)

1.	张永群，王卓琳，蒋利学，冷予冰. 基于地震损失风险的多层砌体结构抗震构造措施评估. 建筑结构. 2023(02): 107-112 . 百度学术
2.	王安东，陈云，廖炜明，苏明双. 阻尼系数对偏心与放大式混合方案减震效果影响的参数分析. 福建建设科技. 2022(02): 23-26 . 百度学术
3.	王安东，陈云，廖炜明，苏明双. 偏心与放大式混合阻尼器体系在某多层钢结构中的应用研究. 福建建筑. 2022(04): 40-43+74 . 百度学术
4.	李锡明，王树和. RC框架结构超强系数与地震经济损失风险分析. 世界地震工程. 2021(01): 219-227 . 百度学术
5.	刘兆文，李云，丁斌. 基于震灾图像维度分析下景观带毁损程度评估的探讨. 地震工程学报. 2019(05): 1367-1373 . 百度学术
6.	张建云，王亮. 钢筋混凝土框架结构震后可存活概率预测方法研究. 地震工程学报. 2019(05): 1155-1160 . 百度学术