THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD

ZHANG Hai-cheng; DU Shu-bi; LI Ming-shui; YANG Yang

doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092

Volume 40 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Engineering Mechanics > 2023 > 40(10): 11-20. > DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092

ZHANG Hai-cheng, DU Shu-bi, LI Ming-shui, YANG Yang. THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(10): 11-20. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0092

Citation:

PDF (9100 KB)

THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD

ZHANG Hai-cheng^1,,
DU Shu-bi^{1, 2, ,},
LI Ming-shui^{1, 2,},
YANG Yang^{1, 2,}

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2.
Key Laboratory for Wind Engineering of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

More Information

Received Date: January 18, 2022
Revised Date: August 09, 2022
Available Online: November 14, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The turbulence profile in the atmospheric boundary can be correctly simulated, but the turbulence integration scale is difficult to accurately simulate. For the CAARC (commonwealth advisory aeronautical research council) standard high-rise building model, the actual turbulence integration scale is 1.4 to 2.7 times that of the common integral scale used in high-rise buildings in conventional wind tunnels. In this paper, five different turbulent integration scales of atmospheric boundary layer wind fields of Category B were considered. One of them was close to the actual flow field, and the effect of the turbulent integration scale on the extreme wind pressure characteristics on the windward of the CAARC model was quantitatively studied by comparing the remaining four flow fields with this flow field. The results show that the extreme wind pressure coefficient increases with the increase of the turbulence integral scale, and the error of the extreme wind pressure coefficient increases with the increase of the error of the simulated turbulence integral scale. When the actual turbulence integral scale is 3.25 times the simulated integral scale, the actual extreme wind pressure coefficient is 1.55 times the extreme wind pressure coefficient in simulated integral scale, and the error rate is as high as 35%. And the closer the stagnation point, the more significant the effect of the turbulence integral scale. To better understand the effect of the turbulence integral scale, the mechanism of the effect of the turbulence integration scale on the extreme wind pressure was analysed through the power spectrum of the fluctuating pressure. Finally, the correction formula of extreme wind pressure coefficient on windward was proposed according to the effect of turbulent integral scale on the extreme wind pressure coefficient. The turbulence integral scale used in this test covers all the error ranges simulated by the turbulence integral scale commonly used in high-rise buildings in conventional wind tunnels, and the standard high-rise building model can provide a correction basis for all wind tunnel experimental results and can be generalized to other blunt bodies.
- turbulence integral scale,
- extreme wind pressure,
- simulation error,
- correction method,
- wind tunnel test

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	IRWIN H P A H. The design of spires for wind simulation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1981, 7(3): 361 − 366. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(81)90058-1
[2]	AIJ 2004, RLB recommendations for loads on buildings [S]. Tokyo, Japan: Structural Standards Committee, Architectural Institute of Japan, 2004.
[3]	MANWELL J F, MCGOWAN J G, ROGERS A L. Wind energy explained: Theory, design and application [M]. Netherlands: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[4]	JTG/T 3360-01−2018, 公路桥梁抗风设计规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2018. JTG/T 3360-01−2018, Wind-resistant design specification for highway bridges [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2018. (in Chinese)
[5]	MOONEGHI M A, IRWIN P, CHOWDHURY A G. Partial turbulence simulation method for predicting peak wind loads on small structures and building appurtenances [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 157: 47 − 62.
[6]	LI Q S, MELBOURNE W H. An experimental investigation of the effects of free-stream turbulence on streamwise surface pressures in separated and reattaching flows [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54/55: 313 − 323. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(94)00050-N
[7]	LI Q S, MELBOURNE W H. The effect of large-scale turbulence on pressure fluctuations in separated and reattaching flows [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83(1/2/3): 159 − 169.
[8]	LI Y G, YAN J H, CHEN X Z, et al. Investigation of surface pressures on CAARC tall building concerning effects of turbulence [J]. Wind and Structures, 2020, 31(4): 287 − 298.
[9]	祝志文, 邓燕华. 湍流积分尺度对高层建筑风荷载影响的大涡模拟[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2018, 53(3): 508 − 516. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.011 ZHU Zhiwen, DENG Yanhua. Investigation into effects of turbulence integral length on wind loads acting on tall buildings using large eddy simulation [J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(3): 508 − 516. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.011
[10]	DAVENPORT A G. Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1964, 28(2): 187 − 196. doi: 10.1680/iicep.1964.10112
[11]	KWON D K, KAREEM A. Comparative study of major international wind codes and standards for wind effects on tall buildings [J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 51: 23 − 35. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.008
[12]	田玉基, 杨庆山, 范重. 《建筑结构荷载规范》围护构件风荷载的修订建议[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(10): 108 − 115. TIAN Yuji, YANG Qingshan, FAN Zhong. Proposed revisions on wind load provisions for cladding and components in 'Load code for the design of building structures' [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2017, 38(10): 108 − 115. (in Chinese)
[13]	庄翔, 董欣, 郑毅敏, 等. 矩形高层建筑非高斯风压时程峰值因子计算方法[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(7): 177 − 185, 223. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.02.0134 ZHUANG Xiang, DONG Xin, ZHENG Yimin, et al. Peak factor estimation methods of non-Gaussian wind pressures on a rectangular high-rise building [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(7): 177 − 185, 223. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.02.0134
[14]	高山, 郑向远, 黄一. 非高斯随机过程的短期极值估计: 复合Hermite模型[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(1): 23 − 31. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.0855 GAO Shan, ZHENG Xiangyuan, HUANG Yi. Hybrid hermite models for short term extrema estimation of non-Gaussian processes [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(1): 23 − 31. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.0855
[15]	潘小涛, 黄铭枫, 楼文娟. 复杂体型屋盖表面风压的高阶统计量与非高斯峰值因子[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(10): 181 − 187. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.05.0398 PAN Xiaotao, HUANG Mingfeng, LOU Wenjuan. High-order statistics and non-Gaussian peak factors of pressure processes on a complex long-span roof [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(10): 181 − 187. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.05.0398
[16]	林强, 刘敏, 杨庆山, 等. 非高斯风压峰值因子估计: 基于矩的转换过程法的对比研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(4): 78 − 86. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.04.0201 LIN Qiang, LIU Min, YANG Qingshan, et al. A comparative study on moment-based translation process methods for the peak factor estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(4): 78 − 86. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.04.0201
[17]	GIOFFRÈ M, GUSELLA V, GRIGORIU M. Non-Gaussian wind pressure on prismatic buildings. I: Stochastic field [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(9): 981 − 989. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(981)
[18]	KUMAR K S, STATHOPOULOS T. Wind loads on low building roofs: A stochastic perspective [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(8): 944 − 956. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(944)
[19]	徐安. 超高层建筑结构风效应的现场实测与风洞试验研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2016. XU An. Field measurement and wind tunnel experimental study on wind effects of super-tall buildings [D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese)
[20]	Bergh H , Tijdeman H . Theoretical and experimental results for the dynamic response of pressure measuring systems [R]. Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 1965.
[21]	IRWIN H P A H, COOPER K R, GIRARD R. Correction of distortion effects caused by tubing systems in measurements of fluctuating pressures [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1979, 5(1/2): 93 − 107.
[22]	谢壮宁, 顾明, 倪振华. 复杂测压管路系统动态特性的通用分析程序[J]. 同济大学学报, 2003, 31(6): 702 − 708. XIE Zhuangning, GU Ming, NI Zhenhua. General arithmetic to analyze dynamic characteristics of complex tubing system for fluctuating wind pressure measurements [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2003, 31(6): 702 − 708. (in Chinese)
[23]	JGJ/T 338−2014, 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015. JGJ/T 338−2014, Standard for wind tunnel test of buildings and structures [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
[24]	LAROSE G L, MANN J. Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1998, 12(5): 511 − 536. doi: 10.1006/jfls.1998.0161
[25]	MELBOURNE W H. Comparison of measurements on the CAARC standard tall building model in simulated model wind flows [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1980, 6(1/2): 73 − 88.
[26]	GB 50009−2012, 建筑结构荷载规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. GB 50009−2012, Load code for the design of building structures [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
[27]	ASCE 7-10, Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures [S]. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
[28]	AS/NZS 1170.2: 2011, Structural design actions – Part 2: Wind actions [S]. New Zealand, Australia: Joint Technical Committee BD-006, 2011.
[29]	NBCC 2010, National building code of Canada [S]. Ottawa, Canada: Associate Committee on the National Building Code, National Research Council, 2010.
[30]	张建胜, 武岳, 沈世钊. 结构风振极值分析中的峰值因子取值探讨[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2007, 4(1): 28 − 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2007.01.006 ZHANG Jiansheng, WU Yue, SHEN Shizhao. Discussion on the value of the peak factor in the analysis of wind-induced vibration [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2007, 4(1): 28 − 32. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7029.2007.01.006
[31]	HUNT J C R. A theory of turbulent flow round two-dimensional bluff bodies [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 61(4): 625 − 706. doi: 10.1017/S0022112073000893

[1]	SHEN Lian, HAN Yan, TANG Chun-chao, YUAN Tao, YANG Ying, KUANG Xi-long. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL TEST OF WIND ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE FACTORS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(5): 88-97. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.04.0270
[2]	LIU Jian-han, MA Wen-yong. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A ROTATING CYLINDER[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(S): 89-92, 132. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.05.S016
[3]	LI Zheng-nong, FAN Xiao-fei, PU Ou, ZHENG Yi-jin, GONG Bo. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON WIND-SAND FLOW FIELD AND WIND-SAND LOAD OF BUILDINGS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(1): 152-158,182. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.02.0067
[4]	LI Guo-qiang, ZHANG Wei-guo, HUANG Xia, WANG Xun-nian. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL WALL INTERFERENCE IN DYNAMIC AIRFOIL TEST[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(8): 235-247. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.07.0380
[5]	LI Shang-bin, LIN Yong-feng, FAN Feng. THE RESEARCH OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TILT ROTOR USING WIND TUNNEL TEST AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHODS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(6): 249-256. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.07.0561
[6]	ZHOU Xuan-yi, ZU Gong-bo, GU Ming. LARGE EDDY SIMULATION AND WIND TUNNEL TEST ON TTU BUILDING MODEL[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(2): 104-110. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.06.0504
[7]	WANG Li-jun, TONG Li-li. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND WIND TUNNEL TEST ON GROUND RADOME UNDER WIND LOAD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(增刊): 283-289. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.05.S003
[8]	SHI Chao, LI Zong-yi, LIU Qing-kuan. WIND TUNNEL TEST METHOD OF SNOW DRIFTING AND OBSERVATION RESEARCH[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(增刊): 15-19. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.05.S059
[9]	XIANG Huo-yue, LI Yong-le, HU Zhe, LIAO Hai-li. SIMULATION METHOD OF POROUS WIND SCREEN SCALE MODEL ON BRIDGE BY WIND TUNNEL TESTS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(8): 212-216. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.05.0321
[10]	LI Yong-le, LU Wei, XIONG Wen-bin, TAO Qi-yu. AGREEMENT BETWEEN WIND TUNNEL TEST AND ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR THE WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF LONG SPAN CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(8): 104-108,.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

王晓伟，钱晋，叶爱君，王靖程，杨光怡. 砂土场地桩柱式墩桥梁桩身地震需求简化计算方法. 工程力学. 2024(12): 150-157 .

本站查看

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (324) PDF downloads (77) Cited by(8)

THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

THE EFFECT OF THE TURBULENCE INTEGRAL SCALE ON THE EXTREME WIND PRESSURES ON THE WINDWARD SURFACE OF THE CAARC MODEL AND THE CORRECTION METHOD

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content