赵 静, 魏英杰, 张嘉钟, 董 磊, 金大桥. 不同湍流模型对空化流动模拟结果影响的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(8): 233-238.
引用本文: 赵 静, 魏英杰, 张嘉钟, 董 磊, 金大桥. 不同湍流模型对空化流动模拟结果影响的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(8): 233-238.
ZHAO Jing, WEI Ying-jie, ZHANG Jia-zhong, DONG Lei, JIN Da-qiao. EFFECT OF VARIOUS TURBULENCE MODELS ON SIMULATED RESULTS OF CAVITATING FLOW[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(8): 233-238.
Citation: ZHAO Jing, WEI Ying-jie, ZHANG Jia-zhong, DONG Lei, JIN Da-qiao. EFFECT OF VARIOUS TURBULENCE MODELS ON SIMULATED RESULTS OF CAVITATING FLOW[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(8): 233-238.

不同湍流模型对空化流动模拟结果影响的研究

EFFECT OF VARIOUS TURBULENCE MODELS ON SIMULATED RESULTS OF CAVITATING FLOW

  • 摘要: 应用4种湍流模型对绕水翼空化流动进行模拟。通过与水洞实验数据实测数据的对比,研究了不同湍流模型在空化流动计算中的预测能力。模拟结果表明:DES(Detached Eddy Simulation)模型所预测的水翼表面压力系数与实验结果最为接近;标准 模型、RNG 模型、Realizable 模型在流场分离区内的预测结果均与实测结果存在较大偏差,其中又以标准 模型的偏差最大。在非定常空化流计算中,DES模型所计算的升力系数显示了强烈的时间依赖性,升力系数波动范围最大;而标准 模型、RNG 模型、Realizable 模型这三种模型所计算的升力系数波动范围不大。

     

    Abstract: Four turbulence models are adopted to simulate cavitating flow around the hydrofoil. Compared with water tunnel experimental data, the precision of each model to simulate cavitating flow is investigated. The simulation results show that the surface pressure coefficient on the hydrofoil predicted by DES(Detached Eddy Simulation)model is the closest to that measured in water tunnel experiment, while the standard model, RNG model, Realizable model give less accurate prediction about the surface pressure coefficient in the detached zone,with the prediction from the standard model having the largest deviation from the experimental data. During the simulation of unsteady flow, the lift coefficient predicted by DES model shows a strong time-dependent behavior, and fluctuates in a large range. However, the lift coefficient predicted by three other models only fluctuate in a small range.

     

/

返回文章
返回