混凝土动态双轴压缩强度准则细观研究

李健; 金浏; 余文轩; 杜修力

doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0091

混凝土动态双轴压缩强度准则细观研究

doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.01.0091

北京工业大学城市减灾与防灾防护教育部重点实验室，北京 100124

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51978022)

详细信息

作者简介:
李　健(1996−)，男，天津人，硕士生，主要从事混凝土材料动态性能方面研究(E-mail: bgdlijian@126.com)

余文轩(1993−)，男，浙江人，博士生，主要从事混凝土结构尺寸效应方面研究(E-mail: ywxmailbox@163.com)

杜修力(1962−)，男，四川人，中国工程院院士，博士，博导，主要从事土木工程防灾减灾方面研究(E-mail: duxiuli@bjut.edu.cn)

通讯作者:
金　浏(1985−)，男，江苏人，教授，博士，博导，主要从事混凝土结构防灾减灾方面研究(E-mail: jinliu@bjut.edu.cn)

中图分类号: TU528.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 416
- HTML全文浏览量: 107
- PDF下载量: 83
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-19
- 修回日期: 2022-04-08
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-23
- 刊出日期: 2023-11-25

MESO-SIMULATION ON DYNAMIC BIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CRITERION OF CONCRETE

Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

摘要

摘要: 由于物理试验设备和条件限制，目前对混凝土动态双轴压缩强度准则的研究仅停留在低应变率范围(10⁻⁵s⁻¹~10⁻²s⁻¹)。针对这些强度准则在更高应变率范围内是否适用，该研究建立了细观随机骨料模型，对边长100 mm的混凝土立方体试块开展了动态双轴压缩细观模拟分析。研究了应变率和侧应力比对混凝土动态双轴压缩破坏模式及压缩强度的影响，建立了适用于更高应变率的动态强度准则。研究结论：相同侧应力比下，随应变率增大，混凝土内部损伤区域增多，动态压缩强度增大；相同应变率下，随侧应力增大，混凝土破坏模式由柱状压裂变为片状劈裂，动态压缩强度先增大后减小。现有的混凝土动态双轴压缩强度准则在应变率为10⁻⁵s⁻¹~1 s⁻¹时很难适用，而该研究建议的强度准则适用于更高的应变率范围，并且得到了不同物理试验的初步验证。
- 混凝土 /
- 侧应力比 /
- 应变率 /
- 动态双轴压缩强度 /
- 双轴强度准则
Abstract: Due to the limitations of physical test equipment and conditions, the existing studies on dynamic biaxial compressive strength criteria of concrete only in the range of low strain rate (10⁻⁵s⁻¹~10⁻²s⁻¹). To investigate whether these strength criteria are applicable at higher strain rates or not, a mesoscopic random aggregate model was established. The meso-simulation analysis of concrete cubic specimens with side length of 100 mm under dynamic biaxial compressive loads were carried out. The influence of strain rate and lateral stress ratio on dynamic biaxial compressive failure modes and compressive strengths of concrete were analyzed. A dynamic biaxial compressive strength criterion applicable to higher strain rate was established. The conclusions are as follows: Under the same lateral stress ratio, a higher strain rate leads to an increase in the internal damaged area and the dynamic compressive strength of concrete. Under the same strain rate, a higher lateral stress ratio causes the failure mode of concrete changes from cylindrical fracturing to sheet splitting and the dynamic compressive strength first increases and then decreases. The existing dynamic biaxial compressive strength criterion of concrete is inapplicable in 10⁻⁵s⁻¹~1 s⁻¹, while the improved strength criterion proposed can be applied to a larger strain rate range, which has been preliminarily verified by various physical tests.
- concrete /
- lateral stress ratio /
- strain rate /
- dynamic biaxial compressive strength /
- biaxial strength criterion

HTML全文

图 1 3D细观有限元模型

Figure 1. 3D Meso-Finite Element Model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 模拟结果与试验^[4]的对比

Figure 2. Comparison between simulation and test results^[4]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同工况下同一破坏阶段的混凝土破坏模式

Figure 3. Failure modes of concrete in the same failure stage under different loading conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同工况下混凝土双轴压缩强度

Figure 4. Concrete biaxial compressive strength under different loading conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 数值模拟值与物理试验值对比

Figure 5. Comparison of numerical and test results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同静态双轴压缩强度准则的对比

Figure 6. Comparison of different static biaxial compression strength criteria

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同应变率下对式(15)的拟合结果

Figure 7. Fitting results of Eq. (15) under different strain rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 低应变率下数值模拟点与式(17)的拟合结果

Figure 8. Fitting results between the numerical data and Eq. (17) under low strain rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同侧应力比下对式(17)的拟合结果

Figure 9. Fitting results of Eq. (17) under different lateral stress ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 强度准则拟合值与文献[5]的对比结果

Figure 10. Comparison between the fitted data and Ref. [5]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 强度准则拟合值与文献[6]的对比结果

Figure 11. Comparison between the fitted data and Ref. [6]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 混凝土双轴强度准则研究现状

Table 1. Research status of concrete biaxial strength criteria

文献	工况	破坏准则
文献[1]	静态	$ \sqrt {f_1^2 + f_2^2 - {f_1}{f_2}} - {\alpha _{\text{s}}}\left( {{f_1} + {f_2}} \right) = \left( {1 - {\alpha _{\text{s}}}} \right){f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}} $
文献[2-3, 8]	静态	$ {\left( {\dfrac{{{f_1}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} + \dfrac{{{f_2}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}}} \right)^2} + a\dfrac{{{f_1}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} + b\dfrac{{{f_2}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} = 0 $
文献[4-7, 9]	动态	$ \dfrac{{{f_1}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} = {P_1} + {P_2}\lg \left( {\dfrac{{\dot \varepsilon }}{{{{\dot \varepsilon }_{\text{s}}}}}} \right) + \dfrac{{{P_3}}}{{{{\left( {1 + \lambda } \right)}^2}}} + \dfrac{{{P_4}\lambda }}{{{{\left( {1 + \lambda } \right)}^2}}} $
文献[10]	动态	$ \dfrac{{{f_1}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} = \left[ {1 + \left( {a + \exp \left( {b\ln \dot \varepsilon } \right)} \right)\dfrac{{{f_2}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}}} \right]\Bigg/{\left( {1 + \dfrac{{{f_2}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}}} \right)^2} $
文献[11]	动态	$ \dfrac{{{f_1}}}{{{f_{{\text{c}},{\text{r}}}}}} = \left[ {1 + a\lg \left( {\dfrac{{\dot \varepsilon }}{{{{\dot \varepsilon }_{\text{s}}}}}} \right)} \right]\dfrac{{b + c\lambda }}{{{{\left( {1 + \lambda } \right)}^2}}} $
注：f₁和f₂分别为双轴荷载下混凝土主轴和侧轴压缩强度；f_c,r为混凝土单轴压缩强度；α_s为受剪屈服参数，取值详见文献[1]；其余参数为各文献中不同形式强度准则的回归参数。动态工况应变率范围为10⁻⁵s⁻¹≤$ \dot \varepsilon $≤10⁻²s⁻¹。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 细观组分参数

Table 2. Meso-component parameters

组分参数	弹性模量E/GPa	泊松比ν	偏心率η/(%)	应力比	膨胀角ψ/(°)	断裂能G_c/(m²·J⁻¹)	不变量应力比K_c	抗压强度σ_c/MPa	抗拉强度σ_t/MPa
骨料颗粒	60.0^①	0.16	0.1	1.16	30	60	0.667	80.0^①	8.0^①
砂浆基质	32.5^①	0.20	0.1	1.16	18	50	0.667	40.0^①	4.0^①
界面过渡区	26.0^②	0.22	0.1	1.16	15	30	0.667	32.0^③	3.2^③
注：① 参考文献[4]；② 参考文献[14-19]；③ 通过反演方法确定。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同工况下式(15)的回归分析参数

Table 3. Regression parameters of Eq. (15) under different loads

应变率/s⁻¹	回归分析参数		R²
应变率/s⁻¹	a	b	R²
10⁻⁵	1.00	3.95	0.999
10⁻³	1.00	3.80	0.998
10⁻²	1.00	3.29	0.990
10⁻¹	1.00	4.00	0.997
1	1.00	4.87	0.997

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同侧应力比下对式(18)的拟合结果

Table 4. Fitting results of Eq. (18) under different lateral stress ratios

侧应力比λ	回归参数			R²
侧应力比λ	m	n	w	R²
0.00	0.017	−0.010	1.00	0.958
0.25	0.043	−0.101	1.00	0.919
0.50	0.042	−0.089	1.00	0.970
0.75	0.041	−0.086	1.00	0.939
1.00	0.047	−0.122	1.00	0.951

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 式(19)各参数拟合结果

Table 5. Fitting results of parameter in Eq. (19)

文献	拟合参数
文献	P_h	P_k	P_l	P_m	P_n
文献[5]	0.134	0.020	8.500	2.373	−1.376
文献[6]	0.276	−0.021	3.289	0.976	0.299

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(41)

[1]	GB 50010−2010, 混凝土结构设计规范 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015. GB 50010−2010, Code for design of concrete structures [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
[2]	张军, 孙雪, 赵志青. 混凝土双轴受压试验与破坏准则研究[J]. 混凝土, 2020(5): 45 − 48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2020.05.012 ZHANG Jun, SUN Xue, ZHAO Zhiqing. Study on concrete biaxial compression test and failure criterion [J]. Concrete, 2020(5): 45 − 48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2020.05.012
[3]	王怀亮, 宋玉普. 不同骨料级配混凝土的双轴压强度试验和破坏准则[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(12): 1353 − 1359. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.12.012 WANG Huailiang, SONG Yupu. Failure criterion of concrete with different aggregate gradations under biaxial compression [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(12): 1353 − 1359. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.12.012
[4]	尚世明. 普通混凝土多轴动态性能试验研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2013. SHANG Shiming. Experimental study on the Multi-axial dynamic behavior of plain concrete [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
[5]	沈璐, 宋玉普, 尹翠. 湿筛二级配大坝混凝土动态双轴受压特性试验[J]. 混凝土, 2017(1): 6 − 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2017.01.002 SHEN Lu, SONG Yupu, YIN Cui. Experimental study of two-graded wet-screened dam concrete under dynamic biaxial compression loading [J]. Concrete, 2017(1): 6 − 10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2017.01.002
[6]	王浩, 王立成, 宋玉普. 饱和大骨料混凝土动态双轴受压力学性能试验研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2016, 56(1): 13 − 19. WANG Hao, WANG Licheng, SONG Yupu. Experimental study of dynamic behavior of saturated dam concrete under biaxial compression [J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2016, 56(1): 13 − 19. (in Chinese)
[7]	申佳玉. 全级配混凝土动态双轴压试验及其损伤本构模型研究 [D]. 大连: 大连交通大学, 2018. SHEN Jiayu. Experimental study on dynamic biaxial compression test and damage constitutive model of full-grade concrete [D]. Dalian: Dalian Jiaotong University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[8]	KUPFER H B, GERSTLE K H. Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses [J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 1978, 99(4): 853 − 866.
[9]	闫东明, 林皋. 双向应力状态下混凝土的动态压缩试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(9): 104 − 108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.09.018 YAN Dongming, LIN Gao. Effect of strain rate on the biaxial compressive behavior of concrete [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(9): 104 − 108. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2006.09.018
[10]	程卓群, 王乾峰, 王普, 等. 双轴受压混凝土动态力学特性及破坏准则研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2019(5): 101 − 107. CHENG Zhuoqun, WANG Qianfeng, WANG Pu, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties and failure criteria of concrete under biaxial compression [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2019(5): 101 − 107. (in Chinese)
[11]	张玘璐, 杨赛利, 王立成. 三级配大骨料混凝土双轴抗压性能试验分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2016(5): 78 − 84. ZHANG Qilu, YANG Saili, WANG Licheng. Experimental analysis of compressive properties of three-graded large aggregate concrete under biaxial compression [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2016(5): 78 − 84. (in Chinese)
[12]	ZHANG Y H, CHEN Q Q, WANG Z Y, et al. 3D mesoscale fracture analysis of concrete under complex loading [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 220: 106646. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106646
[13]	TINE T, MACIEJ W, OLIVIER R, et al. Finite element modelling of the biaxial behaviour of high-performance fibre-reinforced cement composites (HPFRCC) using concrete damaged plasticity [J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2015, 100: 47 − 53.
[14]	金浏, 杨旺贤, 余文轩, 等. 基于细观模拟的轻骨料混凝土动态压缩破坏及尺寸效应分析[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(3): 56 − 65. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.01.0012 JIN Liu, YANG Wangxian, YU Wenxuan, et al. Dynamic compressive failure and size effect in lightweight aggregate concrete based on meso-scale simulation [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(3): 56 − 65. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.01.0012
[15]	金浏, 夏海, 蒋轩昂, 等. 剪跨比对CFRP加固无腹筋混凝土梁剪切破坏及尺寸效应的影响研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(3): 50 − 59, 85. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.01.0028 JIN Liu, XIA Hai, JIANG Xuan'ang, et al. Effect of shear-span ratio on shear failure and size effect of concrete beams without web reinforcement strengthened by CFRP [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(3): 50 − 59, 85. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.01.0028
[16]	金浏, 苗丽越, 李冬, 等. 轴压比对RC剪力墙剪切破坏尺寸效应影响的细观分析[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(9): 26 − 35. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.08.0581 JIN Liu, MIAO Liyue, LI Dong, et al. Influence of axial compression ratio on size effect of RC shear wall under shear failure: Meso-scale simulation [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(9): 26 − 35. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.08.0581
[17]	金浏, 王涛, 杜修力, 等. 钢筋混凝土悬臂梁剪切破坏及尺寸效应律研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(1): 53 − 62. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.11.0596 JIN Liu, WANG Tao, DU Xiuli, et al. Size effect theory on shear failure of rc cantilever beams [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(1): 53 − 62. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.11.0596
[18]	金浏, 余文轩, 杜修力. 应变率突增对混凝土动态拉伸破坏影响的细观模拟[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(2): 39 − 48. JIN Liu, YU Wenxuan, DU Xiuli. Effect of the sudden increase of strain rate on concrete dynamic tensile failure based on 3D meso-scale simulation [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(2): 39 − 48. (in Chinese)
[19]	余文轩, 金浏, 张仁波, 等. 低温下混凝土单轴压缩破坏及尺寸效应细观有限元分析[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2021, 51(3): 305 − 314. doi: 10.1360/SST-2021-0026 YU Wenxuan, JIN Liu, ZHANG Renbo, et al. Mesoscale finite element analysis for uniaxial compressive failure and size effect of concrete at cryogenic temperature [J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2021, 51(3): 305 − 314. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1360/SST-2021-0026
[20]	KIM S M, ABU AL-RUB R K. Meso-scale computational modeling of the plastic-damage response of cementitious composites [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(3): 339 − 358. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.002
[21]	SONG Z, LU Y. Mesoscopic analysis of concrete under excessively high strain rate compression and implications on interpretation of test data [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 46: 41 − 55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.01.010
[22]	ZHOU X Q, HAO H. Modelling of compressive behaviour of concrete-like materials at high strain rate [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2008, 45(17): 4648 − 4661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002
[23]	ZHOU X Q, HAO H. Mesoscale modelling of concrete tensile failure mechanism at high strain rates [J]. Computers and Structures, 2008, 86(21/22): 2013 − 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.013
[24]	ŠAVIJA B, LUKOVIĆ M, PACHECO J, et al. Cracking of the concrete cover due to reinforcement corrosion: A two-dimensional lattice model study [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 44: 626 − 638. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.063
[25]	LUBLINER J, OLIVER J, OLLER S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete [J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299 − 326.
[26]	LEE J, FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892 − 900. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)
[27]	LEE J, FENVES G L. A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(9): 937 − 956.
[28]	张锦华, 方秦, 龚自明, 等. 基于三维细观模型的全级配混凝土静态力学性能的数值模拟[J]. 计算力学学报, 2012, 29(6): 927 − 933, 947. ZHANG Jinhua, FANG Qin, GONG Ziming, et al. Numerical simulation of static mechanical properties based on 3D mesoscale model of fully-graded concrete [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2012, 29(6): 927 − 933, 947. (in Chinese)
[29]	FARAHMANDPOUR C, DARTOIS S, QUIERTANT M, et al. A concrete damage-plasticity model for FRP confined columns [J]. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50(2): 156 − 173. doi: 10.1617/s11527-017-1016-8
[30]	商怀帅, 杨鲁生. 基于损伤理论的混凝土双轴压本构模型[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(1): 340 − 344. SHANG Huaishuai, YANG Lusheng. Constitutive model of damage of concrete under biaxial compression [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 44(1): 340 − 344. (in Chinese)
[31]	HORDIJK D A. Tensile and tensile fatigue behaviour of concrete; experiments, modelling and analyses [J]. Heron, 1992, 37(1): 1 − 79.
[32]	江培情. 混凝土/钢纤维混凝土动态双轴抗压性能研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2015. JIANG Peiqing. Study on the dynamic behavior of concrete/steel fiber reinforced concrete under biaxial stress states [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
[33]	李雪飞, 田杰, 黄洪亮, 等. 混凝土双轴力学性能的细观数值模拟[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2009(1): 18 − 21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3688.2009.01.005 LI Xuefei, TIAN Jie, HUANG Hongliang, et al. Numerical experiment on concrete specimen under biaxial stress [J]. Chinese Harbor Engineering, 2009(1): 18 − 21. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3688.2009.01.005
[34]	孟顺意. 混凝土双轴动态试验研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010. MENG Shunyi. Experimental study on concrete under biaxial dynamic stress [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2010. (in Chinese)
[35]	SHANG H S, JI G J. Mechanical behaviour of different types of concrete under multiaxial compression [J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2014, 66(17): 870 − 876. doi: 10.1680/macr.14.00006
[36]	商怀帅. 引气混凝土冻融循环后多轴强度的试验研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2006. SHANG Huaishuai. Experimental study on strength of air-entrained concrete under multiaxial loads after freeze-thaw cycles [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2006. (in Chinese)
[37]	王立成, 刘汉勇. 海水冻融后轻骨料混凝土的双轴压压强度和变形性能[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(2): 189 − 194. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2006.02.010 WANG Licheng, LIU Hanyong. Strength and deformation characteristics of lightweight aggregate concrete under biaxial compressive stress after freeze-thaw cycling in seawater [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(2): 189 − 194. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2006.02.010
[38]	徐秀娟, 宋玉普, 孙久艳, 等. 冻融循环后湿筛混凝土强度试验与破坏准则研究[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(17): 43 − 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2011.17.012 XU Xiujuan, SONG Yupu, SUN Jiuyan, et al. Study of strength experiment and failure criterion of wet-screened concrete after freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Yangtze River, 2011, 42(17): 43 − 46. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2011.17.012
[39]	王怀亮, 陈雄, 关萍. 大骨料混凝土在双轴压应力状态下的变形和强度试验研究[J]. 大连大学学报, 2007, 28(6): 81 − 87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2395.2007.06.017 WANG Huailiang, CHEN Xiong, GUAN Ping. Experimental study on deformation and strength of mass concrete under biaxial compression [J]. Journal of Dalian University, 2007, 28(6): 81 − 87. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2395.2007.06.017
[40]	覃丽坤. 高温及冻融循环后混凝土多轴强度和变形试验研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2003. QIN Likun. Study on the strength and deformation of concrete under multiaxial stress after high-temperature of freeze-thaw cycling [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2003. (in Chinese)
[41]	冀晓东. 冻融后混凝土力学性能及钢筋混凝土粘结性能的研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2007. JI Xiaodong. Experimental study and theoretical analysis on the mechanical performance of concrete and bond behaviour between concrete and steel bar after freezing and thawing [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)