落层冲击作用下钢管混凝土柱-H型钢梁框架子结构失效机理及耗能分析

FAILURE MECHANISM AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS OF CFST COLUMN TO H-STEEL BEAM FRAME SUBSTRUCTURE UNDER FALLING-DEBRIS IMPACTS

  • 摘要: 基于ABAQUS/Explicit建立了钢管混凝土柱-H型钢梁栓焊混合和全焊接平面框架子结构数值模型,采用落锤模拟上部结构因偶然荷载破坏掉落的碎片,对下部子结构在钢梁跨度不同位置进行了落层冲击分析,通过比较子结构的失效机理和耗能能力等探究冲击位置对该类结构抗冲击性能的影响。结果表明:子结构跨中冲击下节点位置主要表现为拉弯破坏,上翼缘受拉,下翼缘受压向内卷曲,裂缝竖向发展;而梁端冲击下主要表现为剪切破坏,节点位置出现围绕钢梁腹板-翼缘交界位置斜向发展的裂缝;跨中位置相较梁端位置平均冲击力较小,受冲击后挠度恢复能力提高约8%~12%;结合抵抗机理分析,跨中冲击的抗力贡献以弯曲效应为主,达到了90%,梁端冲击只有65%左右;跨中位置由于具有良好的抗弯刚度,受冲击时子结构总耗能更大,且钢梁作为最主要耗能部件相较梁端冲击耗能更有优势;对1/3和1/4梁跨位置进行冲击,发现冲击载荷越靠近跨中,子结构的最大竖向位移增大,悬链线阶段更长,能量耗散能力增强,抗冲击性能更好。

     

    Abstract: Based on ABAQUS/Explicit, the numerical models of bolted-welded hybrid and all-welded planar frame substructures of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and H-shaped steel beams are established. The falling hammer was utilized in the finite element model to simulate the falling fragments from the superstructure caused by accidental load damage. Falling-debris impacts were applied to different locations along the span of the steel beams to explore the effect of locations on impact resistance by comparing failure mechanism and energy dissipation capacity. Results show that: under the mid-span impacts, the joint position of the substructure is mainly characterized by tension-bending failure, tension of the upper flange, inward curl of the lower flange under pressure, and vertical development of cracks; while under the impacts at the beam end, it mainly shows shear failure, and the joint position shows oblique development cracks around the web-flange junction of the steel beam. The average impact force generated by the mid-span impact is smaller than that by the beam-end impact. The deflection recovery ability after the mid-span impact is about 8%~12% higher than that of after the beam-end impact. By analyzing the load resistance mechanism, the resistance contribution of mid-span impacts is dominated by bending effects, reaching 90%, while that of the beam-end impacts is only about 65%. The total energy dissipation is higher under mid-span impacts due to the favorable bending stiffness, and the steel beam, as the main energy dissipating component, has an advantage over the impact energy dissipation at the end of the beam. Compared with the impact effect on 1/3 and 1/4 beam-span positions, the closer the impact load is to the middle of the span, the maximum vertical displacement of the substructure increases, the catenary stage is longer, the energy dissipation capacity is enhanced, and the impact resistance is better.

     

/

返回文章
返回