基于显式算法的RC框架结构抗地震倒塌能力分析

COLLAPSE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAME STRUCTURES USING EXPLICIT ALGORITHM

  • 摘要: 相比于传统动力学分析所采用的隐式算法,显式算法非线性分析的收敛性更好,适宜用来分析结构在倒塌状态附近的强非线性行为。该文基于OpenSees软件平台,采用一种基于修正蛙跳法的显式算法,对按我国规范设计的6个钢筋混凝土(RC)框架结构的抗倒塌能力进行了评估,获得了结构的倒塌易损性曲线,计算得到了结构的倒塌裕度比。在分析过程中,该文对4种不同判据对抗地震倒塌能力的影响进行了分析。其中,第1和第2种判据分别对应我国和美国规范建议的弹塑性层间位移角限值1/50和4%;第3种判据以IDA(Incremental DynamicAnalysis,增量动力分析)曲线上切线斜率低于初始线弹性阶段斜率的20%时的点为结构倒塌点;第4种判据则以结构竖向位移达到1 m来定义结构倒塌状态。分析结果表明:显式算法具有更强的结构非线性分析能力,因此可以更好地模拟结构的倒塌极限状态。判据1~判据3更适宜在结构设计时被用来控制结构倒塌,而判据4利用了结构倒塌的物理意义,其评估结果更接近结构的真实抗倒塌能力。

     

    Abstract: Explicit algorithms have better performance with regarding convergence than implicit algorithms widely used in the conventional dynamic analysis. Explicit algorithms are more suitable for simulating the strong nonlinear behaviors of the structures close to a collapse state. It adopts an explicit algorithm based on a modified leapfrog format to evaluate the seismic collapse resistance of the reinforced concrete (RC) frames designed according to the current Chinese codes. OpenSees is used as the software platform. The seismic collapse fragility curves and the collapse margin ratios are obtained for the RC frames. Four criteria to describe collapse limit states are used and their effects on the collapse resistance of structures are investigated. The first two collapse criteria are corresponding to the inelastic inter-story drift ratio of 1/50 and 4% recommended by Chinese and US codes. The third collapse criterion is defined from the IDA (Incremental Dynamic Analysis) curve with the tangent slope equal to 20% of the initial elastic slope. The fourth collapse criterion is determined by the vertical displacement equaling to 1 m. The results show that explicit algorithms have better nonlinear simulation performance than implicit algorithms and can well approach to the collapse limit state. The first three criteria for the definition of collapse states are suitable for aseismic design to avoid the occurrence of structural collapse due to earthquake excitations. The fourth collapse criterion is derived based on the physical meaning of structural collapse, whose evaluation result is closer to actual structural collapse resistance.

     

/

返回文章
返回