桥梁地震碰撞分析中不同接触单元模型的对比分析
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT CONTACT ELEMENT MODELS IN SEISMIC POUNDING ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES
-
摘要: 地震时邻梁间的碰撞是引起桥梁局部损坏甚至落梁的主要原因。为合理分析桥梁的地震碰撞响应, 基于所开发的结构精细化模拟分析平台FENAP, 对比分析了桥梁地震碰撞分析中不同接触单元模型的计算精度和适用条件。在FENAP平台上引入线性弹簧、Kelvin-Voigt、Hertz和Jan-Hertz-damp等四种接触单元模型, 建立了结构地震碰撞分析平台, 并通过数值验证以及对正弦波和地震动激励下的模型试验的数值分析, 对比分析了不同接触单元模型对结构碰撞响应的影响。研究表明:所建立的结构地震碰撞分析平台具有较高的计算精度和效率;在四种接触单元模型中, Kelvin-Voigt和Jan-Hertz-damp模型的计算精度和适用性更高, 而线性弹簧和Hertz模型, 由于未考虑碰撞过程中的能量损失, 仅适用于恢复系数较高的近似弹性碰撞情况。Abstract: The pounding behavior between adjacent girders is the main cause of the local damage or even collapse of bridges during an earthquake. In order to analyze the seismic pounding responses of bridges reasonably, a comparative analysis on the computational precision and application conditions of different contact element models in the seismic pounding analysis of bridges is made, based on the developed refined simulation platform FENAP. Four contact element models, including the linear spring, Kelvin-Voigt, Hertz and Jan-Hertz-damp models are lead in the FENAP, and a platform for seismic pounding analysis of structures is built. The influence of difference contact element models on the pounding responses of structures is comparatively investigated through the numerical verification and the numerical simulation of model tests under sine waves and earthquake excitations. The results indicate that the developed platform for the seismic pounding analysis of structures has a good precision and efficiency. Among the four contact element models, the Kelvin-Voigt and Jan-Hertz-damp models have higher computational accuracy and applicability, and the linear spring and Hertz models are only suitable for approximately elastic pounding cases with high restitution coefficients due to the inconsideration of the energy loss during a pounding process.