周洲, 韩淼, 吕大刚, 曾立静, 于晓辉. 考虑多损伤指标的RC框架结构主余震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.03.0202
引用本文: 周洲, 韩淼, 吕大刚, 曾立静, 于晓辉. 考虑多损伤指标的RC框架结构主余震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.03.0202
ZHOU Zhou, HAN Miao, LYU Da-gang, ZENG Li-jing, YU Xiao-hui. A FRAGILITY ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO MAINSHOCK-AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES CONSIDERING MULTIPLE DAMAGE INDICATORS[J]. Engineering Mechanics. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.03.0202
Citation: ZHOU Zhou, HAN Miao, LYU Da-gang, ZENG Li-jing, YU Xiao-hui. A FRAGILITY ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO MAINSHOCK-AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES CONSIDERING MULTIPLE DAMAGE INDICATORS[J]. Engineering Mechanics. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.03.0202

考虑多损伤指标的RC框架结构主余震易损性分析

A FRAGILITY ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO MAINSHOCK-AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES CONSIDERING MULTIPLE DAMAGE INDICATORS

  • 摘要: 已有研究表明,采用单一损伤指标难以较好地刻画结构在地震作用下的损伤状态。鉴于此,该文提出一种可考虑多种损伤指标的主余震易损性分析方法。该方法采用条带法获得结构在主余震序列作用下的累积损伤,采用不同损伤指标分别计算相应的统计失效概率。进而将各条带下的统计失效概率取包络值作为失效概率代表值,并联合各条带的主余震强度值构造极大似然函数。通过求解极大似然函数得到主余震易损性函数的中位值和对数标准差,即可获得考虑多损伤指标的主余震易损性曲线。最后,基于易损性曲线采用易损性指数进行考虑多损伤指标的主余震安全评估。为验证该文方法的合理性,以一栋按照我国现行规范设计的RC框架结构作为研究对象,选取最大层间位移角和Park-Ang损伤指数作为双损伤指标,计算了同时考虑最大层间位移角和Park-Ang损伤指数的主余震易损性曲线和易损性指数。通过对比仅考虑单一损伤指标的计算结果,可以看出:选用单一损伤指标得到的易损性曲线和易损性指数均会与同时考虑两种损伤指标得到的计算结果产生一定的偏差,因此,建议在主余震易损性分析中考虑多种损伤指标。若仅考虑一种损伤指标,当主余震强度较低且结构损伤程度较小时,宜选用最大层间位移角;当主余震强度较高、结构损伤程度较大时,宜选用Park-Ang损伤指数。

     

    Abstract: It has been reported that using single damage indicator is difficult to estimate the structural damage under earthquakes. In view of this, a framework of mainshock-aftershock fragility analysis method considering multiple damage indicators is developed in this study. In this framework, a stripe-based approach is used to simulate the accumulated damage under mainshock-aftershock sequences. The statistical failure probability is calculated by different damage indicators. The maximum values of statistical failure probabilities under each strip are taken as the representative failure probabilities. Integrated with the mainshock-aftershock intensities, the maximum likelihood function is generated, and the median value and logarithmic standard deviation of fragility function are obtained by solving the maximum likelihood function. Then the mainshock-aftershock fragilities considering multiple damage indexes can be obtained. Finally, the vulnerability index is used to evaluate the structural safety considering multiple damage indicators. To verify the method proposed in this paper, a RC frame structure designed with current Chinese seismic codes is taken as an example, and the maximum inter story drift and the Park-Ang damage index are selected as the two damage indicators. The fragility curve and the vulnerability index are calculated considering the two damage indicators. Comparing the results with those considering single damage indicator, it is found that the fragility curve and vulnerability index obtained by considering single damage index are different from those by considering two damage indexes. Therefore, it is suggested to consider multiple damage indexes in mainshock-aftershock fragility analysis. If only one damage parameter is considered, the maximum inter story drift should be selected when the mainshock-aftershock is weak, and the structural damage is light. When the earthquake intensity is high and the structural damage is severe, the Park-Ang damage index should be selected in the mainshock-aftershock fragility analysis.

     

/

返回文章
返回