种迅, 霍璞, 沙慧玲, 蒋庆, 李浩然, 侯林兵, 冯玉龙. 单跨两层含减震外挂墙板装配式混凝土框架拟静力试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2024, 41(1): 114-123. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.03.0214
引用本文: 种迅, 霍璞, 沙慧玲, 蒋庆, 李浩然, 侯林兵, 冯玉龙. 单跨两层含减震外挂墙板装配式混凝土框架拟静力试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2024, 41(1): 114-123. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.03.0214
CHONG Xun, HUO Pu, SHA Hui-ling, JIANG Qing, LI Hao-ran, HOU Lin-bing, FENG Yu-long. PSEUDO STATIC TEST ON A SINGLE-SPAN TWO-STORY PRECAST CONCRETE FRAME WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION CLADDING PANELS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41(1): 114-123. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.03.0214
Citation: CHONG Xun, HUO Pu, SHA Hui-ling, JIANG Qing, LI Hao-ran, HOU Lin-bing, FENG Yu-long. PSEUDO STATIC TEST ON A SINGLE-SPAN TWO-STORY PRECAST CONCRETE FRAME WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION CLADDING PANELS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41(1): 114-123. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.03.0214

单跨两层含减震外挂墙板装配式混凝土框架拟静力试验研究

PSEUDO STATIC TEST ON A SINGLE-SPAN TWO-STORY PRECAST CONCRETE FRAME WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION CLADDING PANELS

  • 摘要: 该文在对一个含减震外挂墙板平面框架(简称减震结构)以及一个作为对比的纯框架(简称抗震结构)进行混合试验的基础上,进一步对其单跨2层试验子结构进行了拟静力试验,研究了两结构在水平地震作用下的受力过程、损伤模式及减震外挂墙板对主体结构抗震性能的影响。研究结果表明:减震结构和抗震结构的破坏机制均为梁端和柱底出现塑性铰的梁铰机制,减震外挂墙板未改变主体结构的破坏模式;减震结构中,在最大层间位移角达到1/55之前,消能器呈预期的履带式滚动变形,此后由于外挂墙板的面内转动变形,消能器水平剪切变形值增加不大,且圆弧段产生明显变形;试验过程中减震外挂墙板未出现裂缝;墙板与框架间上部线连接处裂缝宽度较小,连接钢筋应变也较小,表明连接可靠;两试件均具有较好的变形能力和耗能能力;在相同位移级别下,减震结构的刚度、极限承载力和耗能能力均更好。

     

    Abstract: Based on hybrid tests on a planar frame structure with energy dissipation cladding panels (i.e., damping structure) and a planar frame structure (i.e., seismic structure), pseudo static tests were conducted on the substructures to further evaluate the mechanical behavior, damage pattern of these two kinds of structures and the effect of the energy dissipation cladding panels (EDCPs) on the seismic performance of the main structure. The results indicated that beam hinge mechanism, in which plastic hinges form at the beam ends and bottom of the columns, was achieved on both the two specimens, indicating that the EDCPs did not change the damage mode of the main structure. In the damping structure, the U-shaped steel dampers (USDs) maintained the expected crawler-type rolling deformation mode before the maximum inter-story drift reached 1/55. However, due to the in-plane rotation of the cladding panel, only limited increase of the horizontal shear deformation of the USDs occurred, and obvious deformation at the arc segment was observed. No crack appeared on the cladding panels during the test. The widths of the cracks at the line connection and the strain of the connecting reinforcement were small, indicating that the line connection was reliable. Both the two specimens showed satisfying deformation capacity and energy dissipation capacity. Compared with the seismic structure, the damping structure showed better stiffness, load bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity under the same displacement.

     

/

返回文章
返回