白国良, 秦朝刚, 徐亚洲, 苏宁粉, 吴涛, 孙煜喆. 装配整体式与现浇剪力墙结构抗震性能对比分析[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(2): 36-44. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.ST07
引用本文: 白国良, 秦朝刚, 徐亚洲, 苏宁粉, 吴涛, 孙煜喆. 装配整体式与现浇剪力墙结构抗震性能对比分析[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(2): 36-44. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.ST07
BAI Guo-liang, QIN Chao-gang, XU Ya-zhou, SU Ning-fen, WU Tao, SUN Yu-zhe. CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN MONOLITHIC PRECAST CONCRETE AND CAST-IN-PLACE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(2): 36-44. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.ST07
Citation: BAI Guo-liang, QIN Chao-gang, XU Ya-zhou, SU Ning-fen, WU Tao, SUN Yu-zhe. CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN MONOLITHIC PRECAST CONCRETE AND CAST-IN-PLACE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(2): 36-44. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.ST07

装配整体式与现浇剪力墙结构抗震性能对比分析

CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN MONOLITHIC PRECAST CONCRETE AND CAST-IN-PLACE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE

  • 摘要: 为研究装配整体式剪力墙结构的抗震性能,设计制作了参数、加载制度等条件相同的12层装配整体式和现浇剪力墙1∶5缩尺模型结构,并对其进行了振动台试验。研究了两模型结构受地震作用时的裂缝形态、破坏机理,自振频率、振型和阻尼比等动力特性,楼层剪力、倾覆力矩、位移,最大层间位移角和结构延性系数等地震响应参数,并进行了对比分析。结果表明:装配整体式结构连接部位存在初始损伤,在首次地震波输入后,其自振频率下降较大,而二者的振型系数和阻尼比变化趋势基本一致;在弹性阶段,两模型结构的裂缝形态、楼层剪力、倾覆力矩、楼层位移和层间位移角的变化规律基本一致,随着输入地震波加速度峰值的增大,其量值无明显差异;结构进入塑性阶段,两模型结构的裂缝形态及其形成机理的差异,造成现浇结构的自振频率最终降低幅度、层间位移角大于装配整体式结构。两模型结构的地震响应均满足“小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒”的抗震设防目标。

     

    Abstract: To study the aseismic behavior of a monolithic precast concrete structure (MPCS), two 1:5 scale models of 12-storey monolithic precast concrete and cast-in-place shear wall structures (CIPS) made under the same conditions were tested by a shaking table. The crack pattern, failure mechanism, natural frequency, vibration mode and damping ratio, storey shear, overturning moment, inter-storey drift, maximum interlayer displacement angle, and ductility coefficient were analyzed contrastively. For the initial damage of the connection in a monolithic precast concrete structure, the natural frequency decreased obviously after the first earthquake excitation. While the vibration modes and damping ratios were similar. In the elastic stage, the storey shear, overturning moment, inter-storey drift, and maximum interlayer displacement angle changed along the increasing of the PGA of input seismic waves, and the values were similar too. In the plastic stage, the cracks and the distribution of the two model structures were different. As the differences of damage mechanism and crack distribution, the natural frequency and maximum interlayer displacement angle of cast-in-place structure were greater than that of the monolithic precast concrete structure. The aseismic parameters of the model structures could conform to the 3-level design requirement for the fortification against an earthquake.

     

/

返回文章
返回