宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 梅国雄, 梁荣柱, 田乙. 连续排水边界条件下土体一维流变固结解析解[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(9): 79-88. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.06.0349
引用本文: 宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 梅国雄, 梁荣柱, 田乙. 连续排水边界条件下土体一维流变固结解析解[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(9): 79-88. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.06.0349
ZONG Meng-fan, WU Wen-bing, MEI Guo-xiong, LIANG Rong-zhu, TIAN Yi. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL RHEOLOGICAL CONSOLIDATION OF SOIL BASED ON CONTINUOUS DRAINAGE BOUNDARY[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(9): 79-88. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.06.0349
Citation: ZONG Meng-fan, WU Wen-bing, MEI Guo-xiong, LIANG Rong-zhu, TIAN Yi. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL RHEOLOGICAL CONSOLIDATION OF SOIL BASED ON CONTINUOUS DRAINAGE BOUNDARY[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(9): 79-88. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.06.0349

连续排水边界条件下土体一维流变固结解析解

ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL RHEOLOGICAL CONSOLIDATION OF SOIL BASED ON CONTINUOUS DRAINAGE BOUNDARY

  • 摘要: 基于四元件流变模型,通过引入连续排水边界条件研究了单级加载下的土体一维流变固结问题。利用分离变量法和Laplace变换技术得到瞬时荷载下的解析解,进而通过积分的方法得到单级加载下的解析解。随后对排水边界和流变模型进行了退化,得到Terzaghi边界下及三元件流变模型下的一维流变固结解答,通过与现有解答对比初步验证了该文解答的正确性。最后,对不同界面参数、流变参数以及加载速率对土体固结特性的影响进行了分析。结果表明:基于连续排水边界得到的固结解答与基于Terzaghi双面排水得到的固结解答的差异主要在固结前期,且两者的差异随界面参数α、β取值变大而减小。流变固结与线弹性固结差异主要在固结后期,流变固结需要更长时间土体才能完全固结。此外,土体固结速率随加载速率增大而增大。

     

    Abstract: Based on a four-element rheological model, the one-dimensional rheological consolidation problem of soil under one-step loading was studied by introducing continuous drainage boundary conditions. The analytical solution under constant loading is obtained by the separation variable method and the Laplace transform technique, and the analytical solution under one-step loading is obtained by the integral method. Then, by degrading the drainage boundary and rheological model, the solution of one-dimensional rheological consolidation under the Terzaghi's boundary and the three-element rheological model is obtained, and the correctness of the present solution is verified by the comparison with existing solutions. Finally, the consolidation behavior of soil is analyzed for different interface parameters, rheological parameters or loading rate. The results show that:the difference between the consolidation solution based on continuous drainage boundary conditions and that based on Terzaghi's drainage is mainly in the early stage of consolidation, and the difference decreases with the increase of interface parameters α and β. The difference between rheological consolidation and linear elastic consolidation is mainly in the late stage of consolidation, and rheological consolidation requires a longer time for soil to be fully consolidated. In addition, the consolidation rate of soil increases with the increase of loading rate.

     

/

返回文章
返回