徐涛龙, 梁博, 文霞, 姚安林, 李又绿, 蒋宏业. 天然气泄漏爆炸冲击同沟并行邻管的模拟方法[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1): 329-338. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S061
引用本文: 徐涛龙, 梁博, 文霞, 姚安林, 李又绿, 蒋宏业. 天然气泄漏爆炸冲击同沟并行邻管的模拟方法[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1): 329-338. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S061
XU Tao-long, LIANG Bo, WEN Xia, YAO An-lin, LI You-lü, JIANG Hong-ye. EXPLOSION IMPACT SIMULATION METHODS FOR PARALLEL PIPELINE LAYING IN THE SAME DITCH AFTER GAS LEAKAGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(S1): 329-338. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S061
Citation: XU Tao-long, LIANG Bo, WEN Xia, YAO An-lin, LI You-lü, JIANG Hong-ye. EXPLOSION IMPACT SIMULATION METHODS FOR PARALLEL PIPELINE LAYING IN THE SAME DITCH AFTER GAS LEAKAGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(S1): 329-338. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S061

天然气泄漏爆炸冲击同沟并行邻管的模拟方法

EXPLOSION IMPACT SIMULATION METHODS FOR PARALLEL PIPELINE LAYING IN THE SAME DITCH AFTER GAS LEAKAGE

  • 摘要: 任意拉格朗日欧拉算法(arbitrary lagrange-euler algorithm,ALE)、爆腔理论(blasting cavity theory,BC)、光滑粒子流体动力学和有限元耦合法(smooth particle hydrodynamics-finite element method,SPH-FEM)均可模拟天然气管道泄漏后的爆炸冲击效应,三种方法各具特点。利用加拿大Suffield防务研究所的爆炸实验数据,发现ALE和SPH-FEM都能较好地描述爆轰波在土中的传播规律,且SPH-FEM能精确反映爆炸后土体压缩、开裂及地表变形等情况。针对同沟并行的埋地输气管道,设计了基于三种方法的管土爆炸模型,在同种工况下,三种方法得出的管道受力规律基本一致,然而,BC相比于SPH-FEM,土体鼓包变形量更大,结果更偏保守,且BC模型受爆腔半径的制约较大,即当半径大于当量炸药埋深时则无法建模,根据爆轰波作用下土体单元压力时程分析压力传播特征,最后,从管体迎爆面、管顶、管体背爆面及管底的受力变形情况,对爆炸冲击载荷下同沟并行邻管的动力响应进行分析。研究评估了已有爆炸模拟方法的优缺点,为开展并行输气管道极端灾害下的可靠性分析与风险防控提供技术参考。

     

    Abstract: The explosion impact after gas pipeline leakage can be simulated by Arbitrary Lagrange-Euler Algorithm (ALE), Blasting Cavity Theory (BC) and Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics - Finite Element Method (SPH-FEM), each method has its own characteristic. Using the experimental data of Defense Research Establishment Suffield of Canada, it is found that both ALE and SPH can describe the propagation characteristics of detonation waves in a soil well, and SPH-FEM can accurately reflect the compression, cracking and deformation of soil after an explosion. For parallel buried gas pipeline laying in one trench, three pipe-soil explosion models were design based on the mentioned three approaches above, and the same response of pipeline were obtained under the same operating conditions. However, the soil bulging deformation in BC was greater than that in SPH-FEM, the result of the former was more conservative. Moreover, the BC is dominated by the blasting cavity radius, i.e. it cannot be modeled when the radius is larger than the depth of an equivalent explosion. According to the pressure time history curve of the soil unit under the action of detonation wave, the pressure propagation characteristics were analyzed. Finally, the stress and deformation of the attack surface, top surface, back surface and bottom surface of a pipe were analyzed. The research evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of the existing explosion simulation approaches, which can provide technical references for the reliability analysis and risk prevention and control of parallel gas pipelines under extreme disasters.

     

/

返回文章
返回