刘庆宽, 孙一飞, 张磊杰, 胡波, 马文勇, 刘小兵. 凹痕对斜拉桥斜拉索气动性能影响研究[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1): 272-277. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S053
引用本文: 刘庆宽, 孙一飞, 张磊杰, 胡波, 马文勇, 刘小兵. 凹痕对斜拉桥斜拉索气动性能影响研究[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1): 272-277. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S053
LIU Qing-kuan, SUN Yi-fei, ZHANG Lei-jie, HU Bo, MA Wen-yong, LIU Xiao-bing. STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF DENT ON AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF STAY CABLES OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(S1): 272-277. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S053
Citation: LIU Qing-kuan, SUN Yi-fei, ZHANG Lei-jie, HU Bo, MA Wen-yong, LIU Xiao-bing. STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF DENT ON AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF STAY CABLES OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(S1): 272-277. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.05.S053

凹痕对斜拉桥斜拉索气动性能影响研究

STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF DENT ON AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF STAY CABLES OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE

  • 摘要: 斜拉索具有长细比大、柔度大、阻尼小等特点,其风荷载和风致振动研究具有重要工程意义。通过测力和测振风洞试验,对具有特定形状、尺寸凹痕的斜拉桥斜拉索气动力和风致振动性能进行了研究,分析了风攻角和雷诺数对具有凹痕斜拉索平均阻力系数和平均升力系数的影响规律,研究了风攻角和雷诺数对具有凹痕斜拉索临界区振动特征值(振幅和平衡位置)的影响规律,结果表明:风攻角对具有凹痕斜拉索的气动力系数随雷诺数变化曲线影响明显,30°和60°风攻角下,临界雷诺数减小,临界区宽度增加;在试验雷诺数范围内,具有凹痕斜拉索在不同风攻角下最大振幅差别较大,60°风攻角时最大,30°风攻角时最小,而平衡位置偏移最大值在各个风攻角下基本相同。

     

    Abstract: For the characteristics of a large slenderness ratio, large flexibility and low damping of a cable-stayed bridge, the researches on the wind load and wind-induced vibration of stay cables are of a great engineering significance. Through a wind tunnel test, the wind-induced vibration performances of stay cables with special shape and size dent were studied. It was studied that the influence of wind angle of attack and Reynolds number on mean drag coefficient and mean lift coefficient of cables with dents. The influences of wind angle of attack and Reynolds number on characteristic of wind-induced vibration in the critical region of stay cables with dents were analyzed, the characteristics mainly including the amplitude and equilibrium position. It is shown that the wind angle of attack influences the profile of aerodynamic coefficients versus Reynolds number remarkably. For example, when the wind angle of attack is 30° or 60°, the critical number is smaller and the width of critical regime is bigger. There are obvious differences among maximum amplitudes with different wind angles of attack. With the wind angle of attack being 60°, the maximum amplitude is the maximum. And with the wind angle of attack being 30°, the maximum amplitude is the minimum. However, the maximum equilibrium position is basically the same at all wind angles of attack.

     

/

返回文章
返回