黄盛楠, 刘英奎, 叶列平, 孙海林, 冯 鹏, 陆新征. 预应力高强轻骨料混凝土连续刚构桥的试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2007, 24(增Ⅰ): 134-140.
引用本文: 黄盛楠, 刘英奎, 叶列平, 孙海林, 冯 鹏, 陆新征. 预应力高强轻骨料混凝土连续刚构桥的试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2007, 24(增Ⅰ): 134-140.
HUANG Sheng-nan, LIU Ying-kui, YE Lie-ping, SUN Hai-lin, FENG Peng, LU Xin-zheng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PRESTRESSED-HIGH-STRENGTH-LIGHT-WEIGHT -CONCRETE CONTINUOUS RIGID FRAME BRIDGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(增Ⅰ): 134-140.
Citation: HUANG Sheng-nan, LIU Ying-kui, YE Lie-ping, SUN Hai-lin, FENG Peng, LU Xin-zheng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PRESTRESSED-HIGH-STRENGTH-LIGHT-WEIGHT -CONCRETE CONTINUOUS RIGID FRAME BRIDGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(增Ⅰ): 134-140.

预应力高强轻骨料混凝土连续刚构桥的试验研究

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PRESTRESSED-HIGH-STRENGTH-LIGHT-WEIGHT -CONCRETE CONTINUOUS RIGID FRAME BRIDGE

  • 摘要: 强度等级在CL40以上的高强轻质混凝土(HSLWC)应用于大跨度桥梁结构,具有减轻自重,有效降低结构内力,增大跨度,减少桥墩数量等优点。以云南安宁至楚雄高速公路14号达连坝段公路桥为原型,按照1/4比例设计了一个3跨预应力高强轻骨料混凝土连续刚构桥,其桥面结构采用CL50混凝土,进行了多种荷载工况的试验研究。结果表明,预应力高强轻骨料混凝土连续刚构桥具有较好的受力性能,1倍和1.5倍等效车队荷载通过时,各项指标均满足规范要求;2倍等效车队荷载通过时,部分指标不满足使用要求,但桥梁表现出了较好的延性;在严重超载情况下,桥梁虽破坏严重,但仍可保持较好的承载力水平且不会发生跨塌。

     

    Abstract: High-strength-light-weight concrete (HSLWC) (with a cube strength higher than CL40) has a bright future in the application of large-span bridges due to its obvious advantages. It reduces the self-weight of the bridge, so that the internal stress can be smaller, the span can be larger and the number of piers can be reduced. An experimental research on a 3-span prestressed continuous rigid frame model bridge with a superstructure made of CL50 HSLWC is presented in this paper. The prototype of the bridge model is located in the 14th section of the highway connecting Anning and Chuxiong in Yunnan province. The model bridge was designed by the scale of 1/4 and was tested under 10 different load cases. The test results showed that the prestressed HSLWC continuous rigid frame model bridge had good mechanical performance. Under a traffic load which was 1.0 to 1.5 times of its design load, all indices of the bridge model satisfied the requirement of design standard. And under 2 times of design load, parts of indices were beyond the standard requirement but the bridge still showed good ductility. And under very large overload situation, the bridge was damaged seriously but it still could maintain the load capacity and did not collapse.

     

/

返回文章
返回