郑炜, 董亚民, 孙学伟. LBB稳定性研究的可靠性分析及临界裂纹长度计算[J]. 工程力学, 2004, 21(1): 72-76.
引用本文: 郑炜, 董亚民, 孙学伟. LBB稳定性研究的可靠性分析及临界裂纹长度计算[J]. 工程力学, 2004, 21(1): 72-76.
ZHENG Wei, DONG Ya-min, SUN Xue-wei. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF LBB STABILITY AND CALCULATION OF CRITICAL CRACK LENGTH[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(1): 72-76.
Citation: ZHENG Wei, DONG Ya-min, SUN Xue-wei. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF LBB STABILITY AND CALCULATION OF CRITICAL CRACK LENGTH[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(1): 72-76.

LBB稳定性研究的可靠性分析及临界裂纹长度计算

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF LBB STABILITY AND CALCULATION OF CRITICAL CRACK LENGTH

  • 摘要: 对当前工程计算领域的各种LBB稳定性研究方法进行了深入的可靠性分析,发现:形变塑性失效评定图法(DPFAD)和PD6493改进分析方法忽视了外加荷载的加载曲线的非直线性问题;而J积分撕裂模量汇交方法(J-T)所忽视的则是J积分加载曲线的非直线性问题.这些不足使得上述几种方法在理论上只能成为近似解法.而优化方法1由于不依赖于任何假设和几何原理,所以在精度上远远高于这些近似方法.基于上述分析,将对各种稳定性研究技术通过实例进行深层对比,并对作为稳定性分析反问题的临界裂纹长度计算进行了工程实例的验证.

     

    Abstract: This paper reveals some latent insufficiency of LBB stability analysis, which has been ignored for a long time. DPFAD method overlooks the problem of non-linear loading curve; J-integral tearing modulus inter-section method also overlooks the problem of non-linear J-integral loading curve. Such deficiency detracts from the accuracy of these methods, while the optimization assessment method can gain higher precision than them with no hypothetical or geometric approximation. This paper provides reliability analysis based on different stability analysis theory and calculates the critical crack length of an engineering example as a reverse problem to stability analysis.

     

/

返回文章
返回