谢甫哲, 舒赣平. 钢框架连续倒塌的模拟方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(10): 34-040.
引用本文: 谢甫哲, 舒赣平. 钢框架连续倒塌的模拟方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(10): 34-040.
XIE Fu-zhe, SHU Gan-ping. RESEARCH ON THE MODEL METHOD OF PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(10): 34-040.
Citation: XIE Fu-zhe, SHU Gan-ping. RESEARCH ON THE MODEL METHOD OF PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(10): 34-040.

钢框架连续倒塌的模拟方法研究

RESEARCH ON THE MODEL METHOD OF PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES

  • 摘要: 对钢框架结构在进行连续倒塌分析时的计算模型进行了研究。以1个两层两跨平面钢框架为例,分别建立了传统的理想刚接杆系模型和实体模型,采用抽柱法对2种模型进行了动力非线性分析,比较分析结果得出传统的理想刚接杆系模型由于没能考虑节点的受力与塑性变形,不能准确地反映结构连续倒塌的动力效应,使得结构抗连续倒塌性能评估结果偏不安全。对引入节点机械模型的平面钢框架进行连续倒塌分析,其计算结果与实体模型的结果接近,可较准确地反映结构抗连续倒塌性能,且耗时远小于实体模型的计算时间。建议对框架结构进行连续倒塌分析时采用引入节点性能的杆系模型。

     

    Abstract: The simply modeling method of progressive collapse analysis is investigated. The traditional beam element model with absolutely rigid or pinned joints and a solid model are established according to the analysis example which is a 2-storie and 2-bay planer steel frame. The progressive collapse analysis results of the models indicate that the traditional beam element model can not accurately reflect the dynamic effect of the structure because the plastic deformation can not be considered by the idealized joints, and the assessment produced by the traditional beam element model is unconservatice. The analysis results produced by the beam element model introducing a joint mechanical model are very close to that of the solid model of the planner steel frame, while the time consumed by the former is much less than that of the latter. It is recommended to model the structure by a one-dimension element and a mechanical model when carrying on the progressive collapse analysis.

     

/

返回文章
返回