伞冰冰, 武 岳, 沈世钊. 膜结构有限元分析中的平面单元与曲面单元的比较[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(2): 168-173.
引用本文: 伞冰冰, 武 岳, 沈世钊. 膜结构有限元分析中的平面单元与曲面单元的比较[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(2): 168-173.
SAN Bing-bing, WU Yue, SHEN Shi-zhao. COMPARISON BETWEEN PLANE AND CURVED ELEMENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(2): 168-173.
Citation: SAN Bing-bing, WU Yue, SHEN Shi-zhao. COMPARISON BETWEEN PLANE AND CURVED ELEMENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(2): 168-173.

膜结构有限元分析中的平面单元与曲面单元的比较

COMPARISON BETWEEN PLANE AND CURVED ELEMENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

  • 摘要: 在对膜结构进行有限元模拟时,通常采用两种面单元形式——平面常应变三角形单元和六结点曲面三角形等参元,究竟哪一种单元形式更优一直是存在争议的问题。首先就这两种单元的有限元格式进行探讨,比较了它们在位移模式、几何方程及刚度矩阵等方面的力学本质差异;然后,通过一些典型算例,比较了它们在计算精度和计算效率等方面的优劣。分析结果表明:在有限元格式方面,曲面三角形等参元较之平面常应变三角形单元更为完备,更加符合结构的实际受力特征;在计算精度和计算效率方面,曲面三角形等参元也要优于平面常应变三角形单元;因此,从结构精细化分析的角度来看,宜采用曲面三角形等参元来进行膜结构有限元分析。

     

    Abstract: It is always a question open to discuss that which kind of element is more optimal for the finite element analysis of membrane structures, the triangular finite element of constant stress or the curved triangular finite element with 6 nodes. This paper carries on the analysis of this problem. It first focuses on the format of the two kinds of finite elements, revealing some elemental differences on a displacement model, the geometry equation and stiffness matrix between the two elements. Then by typical numerical examples, their accuracy and efficiency in calculation are analyzed and compared. The study shows that: curved triangular elements are more comprehensive and closer to the mechanical performance of authentic membrane, compared with triangular finite elements of constant stress; also the former appear more advantageous on accuracy and efficiency of the calculation. Therefore, from a point of view on refined analysis, it is better to adopt curved triangular elements in calculation.

     

/

返回文章
返回