ZHENG Yan-feng, LI Si-yuan, YANG Chao, LUO Yao-zhi. DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF BENNETT LINKAGE WITH PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES USING CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS METHOD AND FINITE PARTICLE METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.08.0634
Citation: ZHENG Yan-feng, LI Si-yuan, YANG Chao, LUO Yao-zhi. DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF BENNETT LINKAGE WITH PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES USING CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS METHOD AND FINITE PARTICLE METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.08.0634

DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF BENNETT LINKAGE WITH PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES USING CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS METHOD AND FINITE PARTICLE METHOD

More Information
  • Received Date: August 27, 2023
  • Revised Date: December 19, 2023
  • Available Online: January 11, 2024
  • Bennett linkage in engineering may contain uncertain parameters, and the influence of uncertain parameters need to be considered in its dynamic analysis. In this study, a dynamic analysis method is proposed for Bennett linkage with parameter uncertainties based on Chebyshev polynomials method and finite particle method (FPM). Firstly, the modeling method of Bennett linkage and the corresponding elements of FPM are presented. Subsequently, by introducing Chebyshev polynomials method, the dependence of the system dynamic response on its parameters is established, and the boundaries of dynamic response can be obtained through interval operations. A non-intrusive uncertainty analysis method that can be easily integrated with the FPM is proposed. Finally, the effectiveness of the method proposed is validated by the numerical examples, and the dynamic analysis of Bennett linkage with parameter uncertainties is conducted. The analysis results indicate that the uncertainty in link lengths significantly influences both the displacement response and velocity response of Bennett linkage. The maximum difference between upper and lower displacement boundaries accounts for 87.1% of that of the deterministic parameter model at that particular time. The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of link has a minor impact on the displacement of Bennett linkage but a substantial impact on the velocity and potential energy of link. The maximum difference between upper and lower velocity boundaries accounts for 277.0% of that of the deterministic parameter model at that particular time. Strong external forces, such as the contact between adjacent links, can significantly enhance the influence of uncertain parameters.

  • [1]
    BENNETT G T. A new mechanism [J]. Engineering, 1903, 76: 777 − 778.
    [2]
    CHEN Y, YOU Z. Deployable structural element based on Bennett linkages [C]// ASME 2001 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001: 89 − 94.
    [3]
    李俐. 基于Bennett 4R linkage的折叠结构[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2005.

    LI Li. Deployable structure based on Bennett 4R linkage [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    MELIN N O. Application of Bennett mechanisms to long-span shelters [D]. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2004.
    [5]
    ISUKAPALLI S S. Uncertainty analysis of transport-transformation models [D]. New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey, 1999.
    [6]
    WU J L, LUO Z, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Interval uncertain method for multibody mechanical systems using Chebyshev inclusion functions [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 95(7): 608 − 630. doi: 10.1002/nme.4525
    [7]
    FISHMAN G. Monte Carlo: Concepts, algorithms, and applications [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
    [8]
    MYERS R H, MONTGOMERY D C, ANDERSON-COOK C M. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
    [9]
    WEI X X, LIU J C, BI S F. Uncertainty quantification and propagation of crowd behaviour effects on pedestrian-induced vibrations of footbridges [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 167: 108557. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108557
    [10]
    SUN D Y, ZHANG B Q, LIANG X F, et al. Dynamic analysis of a simplified flexible manipulator with interval joint clearances and random material properties [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 98(2): 1049 − 1063. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05248-3
    [11]
    XIANG W W K, YAN S Z, WU J N, et al. Dynamic response and sensitivity analysis for mechanical systems with clearance joints and parameter uncertainties using Chebyshev polynomials method [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 138: 106596. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106596
    [12]
    LEE C. Kinematic analysis and dimensional synthesis of Bennett 4R mechanism [J]. JSME International Journal Ser. C, Dynamics, Control, Robotics, Design and Manufacturing, 1995, 38(1): 199 − 207. doi: 10.1299/jsmec1993.38.199
    [13]
    SIMO J C, VU-QUOC L. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions-a geometrically exact approach [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 66(2): 125 − 161. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90073-4
    [14]
    TIAN Q, ZHANG Y Q, CHEN L P, et al. Dynamics of spatial flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated spherical joints [J]. Computers & Structures, 2009, 87(13/14): 913 − 929.
    [15]
    FLORES P. A parametric study on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems with multiple clearance joints [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2010, 61(4): 633 − 653. doi: 10.1007/s11071-010-9676-8
    [16]
    唐敬哲, 汪伟, 郑延丰, 等. 基于并行有限质点法的界面断裂-接触行为分析[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(6): 24 − 35. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.06.0424

    TANG Jingzhe, WANG Wei, ZHENG Yanfeng, et al. Interface failure and contact analysis based on parallelized finite particle method [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(6): 24 − 35. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.06.0424
    [17]
    姚俊杰, 郑延丰, 唐敬哲, 等. 基于有限质点法的分布协调式多尺度分析[J]. 工程力学, 2023: 1 − 12, doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.11.0958.

    YAO Junjie, ZHENG Yanfeng, TANG Jingzhe, et al. Coordinated distributing multi-scale analysis based on finite particle method [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023: 1 − 12, doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.11.0958. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    YU Y, LUO Y Z. Finite particle method for kinematically indeterminate bar assemblies [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 2009, 10(5): 669 − 676. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A0820494
    [19]
    YU Y, LUO Y Z. Motion analysis of deployable structures based on the rod hinge element by the finite particle method [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 223(7): 955-964.
    [20]
    ZHENG Y F, WAN H P, ZHANG J Y, et al. Local-coordinate representation for spatial revolute clearance joints based on a vector-form particle-element method [J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021, 21(7): 2150093. doi: 10.1142/S0219455421500930
    [21]
    DONG S Q, ZHAO X H, YU Y. Dynamic unfolding process of origami tessellations [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2021, 226/227: 111075. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111075
    [22]
    WU J L, ZHANG Y Q, CHEN L P, et al. A Chebyshev interval method for nonlinear dynamic systems under uncertainty [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(6): 4578 − 4591. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.073
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Yi-heng, HU Jin-jun, LIU Ba-li. UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION METHOD OF GROUND MOTION FOR SEISMIC FRAGILITY ANALYSIS OF RC FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. Engineering Mechanics. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2024.09.0693
    [2]ZHENG Yan-feng, YANG Chao, LIU Lei, LUO Yao-zhi. DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF PLANAR MECHANISM WITH REVOLUTE JOINT CLEARANCE BASED ON FINITE PARTICLE METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(3): 8-17. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.04.0212
    [3]REN Ye-fei, YIN Jian-hua, WEN Rui-zhi, JI Kun. THE IMPACT OF GROUND MOTION INPUTS ON THE UNCERTAINTY OF STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE FRAGILITY[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(1): 115-125. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.01.0042
    [4]WENG Meng-xiu, LEI Ying. PROBABILITY ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION INCLUDING SYSTEM UNCERTAINTY[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(增刊): 29-32. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.05.S004
    [5]SHI Xing-hua, HANG Cen, JI Chun-yan, SHI Xiao-yan. UNCERTAINTY IN ANALYZING ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF SHIP STIFFENING PLATES WITH INITIAL INPERFECTIONS USING NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(2): 221-226. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.08.0747
    [6]LI Zhong-xian, LU Jian-hui, SHI Yan-chao, DING Yang. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF STEEL BEAM UNDER UNCERTAIN BLAST LOADS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(4): 112-118,133. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.11.0848
    [7]YU Ying, XU Xian, LUO Yao-zhi. DYNAMIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES BASED ON THE FINITE PARTICLE METHOD[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(6): 63-69,84. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2010.08.0746
    [8]PAN Zuan-feng, LU Zhi-tao, LIU Zhao, MENG Shao-ping. UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF CREEP AND SHRINKAGE EFFECT IN CONTINUOUS RIGID FRAME OF SUTONG BRIDGE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(9): 67-073.
    [9]TANG Yu-chuan, ZHANG Yu-liang, ZHANG Tong-sheng. NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES WITH VISCOUS DAMPERS[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(1): 67-71,1.
    [10]Lou Menglin. STATIC SUBSTRUCTURE METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 7(1): 57-66.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (46) PDF downloads (11) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return