ZHANG Zhi-guo, YE Tong, ZHANG Cheng-ping, PAN Yu-tao, SHEN An-xin, WU Zhong-teng. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BURIED PIPELINE UNDER CNOIDAL WAVE LOAD BASED ON PASTERNAK SEABED MODEL[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41(1): 76-89. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.02.0190
Citation: ZHANG Zhi-guo, YE Tong, ZHANG Cheng-ping, PAN Yu-tao, SHEN An-xin, WU Zhong-teng. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BURIED PIPELINE UNDER CNOIDAL WAVE LOAD BASED ON PASTERNAK SEABED MODEL[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41(1): 76-89. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.02.0190

ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BURIED PIPELINE UNDER CNOIDAL WAVE LOAD BASED ON PASTERNAK SEABED MODEL

More Information
  • Received Date: February 26, 2022
  • Revised Date: May 09, 2022
  • Available Online: June 24, 2022
  • A two-stage analysis method is used to explore the dynamic response of the embedded pipeline under the action of cnoidal waves. Based on the cnoidal wave theory, using the Biot’s consolidation equation, the periodic wave pressure on the buried pipeline in the shallow water area under the action of nonlinear waves is derived. The pipeline is considered as a Euler-Bernoulli beam on the dynamic Pasternak seabed model, and the obtained wave load is applied to the pipeline. Through the force analysis of the micro-element body, the results of infinite-length pipeline placed on the Pasternak seabed are obtained. The response controls partial differential equation of the pipeline under seepage force and dynamic load; the Fourier transform and Laplace transform are used to simplify the equation, and the analytical solution is obtained with the help of the convolution theorem. The pipeline dynamic response solutions of deflection, velocity, acceleration, rotation angle, bending moment and shear force are obtained. Through comparative analysis with three-dimensional finite element calculation examples and existing test data, the correctness and applicability of the theoretical solution are verified. The sensitive parameters of the dynamic response characteristics of embedded pipeline under the action of cnoidal wave are analyzed; The results show that the wave height H significantly affects the shape of the wave surface and the wave force in the seabed; Under different H, the changes of pipeline rotation angle, bending moment and shear force are more obvious, while the sensitivity of deflection, velocity and acceleration response is lower.

  • [1]
    SHOGHI R, SHIRI H. Re−assessment of trench effect on fatigue performance of steel catenary risers in the touchdown zone [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 94(11): 101989.
    [2]
    ZHAO E J, DONG Y K, TANG Y Z, et al. Numerical investigation of hydrodynamic characteristics and local scour mechanism around submarine pipelines under joint effect of solitary waves and currents [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 222(2): 108553.
    [3]
    ZHAO H Y, LIU X L, JENG D S, et al. Numerical investigation into the vulnerability to liquefaction of an embedded pipeline exposed to ocean storms [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2022, 172(3): 104056.
    [4]
    DING H B, TONG L H, XU C J, et al. Dynamic responses of shallow buried composite cylindrical lining embedded in saturated soil under incident P wave based on nonlocal−Biot theory [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 121(6): 40 − 56.
    [5]
    HUANG J Q, SHAO W A, ZHAO M, et al. Simplified analytical solution for circular tunnel under obliquely incident SV wave [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 140(1): 106429.
    [6]
    ZhU C W, YING H W, GONG X N, et al. Analytical solution for wave−induced hydraulic response on subsea shield tunnel [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 228(5): 108924.
    [7]
    张宏涛, 赵宇飞, 高明旭, 等. 穿越非均匀土体埋地管道地震离心实验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(11): 88 − 94. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.10.0747

    ZHANG Hongtao, ZHAO Yufei, GAO Mingxu, et al. Centrifugal seismic experimental strudy of buied pipelines in non-uniform soil [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(11): 88 − 94. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.10.0747
    [8]
    ZHAI Y Y, HE R, ZHANG J S, et al. Physical model of wave−induced seabed response around trenched pipeline in sandy seabed [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2018, 75(6): 37 − 52.
    [9]
    TIAN J P, ZHANG J, DONG F F, et al. Dynamic response of buried pipeline subject to impact loads using piezoceramic transducers [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2019, 177(9): 103984.
    [10]
    姜逢源, 赵玉良, 谭俊哲, 等. 海床土体减缓坠物对海底管道撞击作用的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(5): 235 − 245. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.03.0183

    JIANG Fengyuan, ZHAO Yuliang, TAN Junzhe, et al. Study on the effect of seabed soil on relieving damage of submarine pipelines impacted by dropped objects [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(5): 235 − 245. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.03.0183
    [11]
    ZHU T, WANG R, ZHANG J M. Evaluation of various seismic response analysis methods for underground structures in liquefiable ground [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 110(1): 103803.
    [12]
    陈国兴, 夏高旭, 王彦臻, 等. 琼州海峡海床地震反应特性的一维非线性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(5): 75 − 85. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.03.0167

    CHEN Guoxing, XIA Gaoxu, WANG Yanzhen, et al. One-dimensional nonlinear seismic response analysis for seabed site effect assessment in the Qiongzhou strait [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(5): 75 − 85. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.03.0167
    [13]
    ZHOU M, LIU H, JENG D S, et al. Modelling the wave-induced instantaneous liquefaction in a non-cohesive seabed as a nonlinear complementarity problem [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 137(9): 104275.
    [14]
    LI X H, CHEN G M, ZHU H W. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 103(9): 163 − 173.
    [15]
    SUN Y, CAO X W, LIANG F C. Investigation on underwater spreading characteristics and migration law of oil leakage from damaged submarine pipelines [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 127(5): 329 − 347.
    [16]
    YE J, LU Q. Seismic dynamics of a pipeline shallowly buried in loosely deposited seabed foundation [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 243(1): 110194.
    [17]
    XU J S, LI G G, DONG P, et al. Bedform evolution around a submarine pipeline and its effects on wave−induced forces under regular waves [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37(2): 304 − 313.
    [18]
    王小雯, 张建民. 随机波浪作用下饱和砂质海床弹塑性动力响应规律[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(6): 240 − 248. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.02.0157

    WANG Xiaowen, ZHANG Jianmin. Elasto-plastic dynamic behaviors of saturated sandy seabed under random waves [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(6): 240 − 248. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.02.0157
    [19]
    MCDOUGAL W G, DAVIDSON S H, MONKMEYER P L, et al. Wave induced forces on buried pipeline [J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 1988, 114(2): 220 − 236. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1988)114:2(220)
    [20]
    YU H, YUAN Y. Analytical solution for an infinite Euler−Bernoulli beam on a viscoelastic foundation subjected to arbitrary dynamic loads [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(3): 542 − 551. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000674
    [21]
    ZHEN B, XU J, SUN J Q. Analytical solutions for steady state responses of an infinite Euler−Bernoulli beam on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation subjected to a harmonic moving load [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 476(6): 115271.
    [22]
    YANG Y S, YU H T, YUAN Y, et al. Analytical solution for longitudinal seismic response of long tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2020, 44(10): 1371 − 1385. doi: 10.1002/nag.3066
    [23]
    冯浩, 杨喻声, 禹海涛. 行波效应下黏弹性地基梁动力响应解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1): 126 − 132.

    FENG Hao, YANG Yusheng, YU Haitao. Dynamic response of viscoelastic foundation beams under traveling wave effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 126 − 132. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    ANTONIO L M, PAVANELLO R, DE ALMEIDA BARROS P L. Marine pipeline–seabed interaction modeling based on Kerr-type foundation [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2018, 80(11): 228 − 239.
    [25]
    王树青, 梁丙臣. 海洋工程波浪力学 [M]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学出版社, 2013: 60 − 61.

    WANG Shuqing, LIANG Bingchen. Wave mechanics for ocean engineering [M]. Qingdao: China Ocean University Press, 2013: 60 − 61. (in Chinese)
    [26]
    邱大洪. 波浪理论及其在工程上的应用 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1985.

    QIU Dahong. The engineering application of wave theory [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1985. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    FU C J, WANG P Y, ZHAO T L, et al. Allowable span length of submarine pipeline in shallow water [J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2017, 36(5): 1351012.
    [28]
    WIEGEL R L. A presentation of cnoidal wave theory for practical application [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1960, 7(2): 273 − 286. doi: 10.1017/S0022112060001481
    [29]
    ATTEWELL P B, YEATES J, SELBY A R. Soil movements induced by tunneling and their effects on pipelines and structures [R]. London: Blackie & Son Ltd., 1986.
    [30]
    TANAHASHI H. Formulas for an infinitely long Bernoulli−Euler beam on the Pasternak model [J]. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society, 2004, 44(5): 109 − 118.
    [31]
    徐凌. 软土盾构隧道纵向沉降研究 [D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2005.

    XU Ling. Study on longitudinal settlement of shield tunnel in soft soil [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2005. (in Chinese)
    [32]
    宋坤. 埕岛油田悬空海底管线受力特性研究 [D]. 山东: 中国石油大学(华东), 2016.

    SONG Kun. Mechanical properties research on spanning submarine pipeline of Chengdao oil field [D]. Shandong: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2016. (in Chinese)
    [33]
    LIU B, JENG D S, YE G L, et al. Laboratory study for pore pressures in sandy deposit under wave loading [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 106(9): 207 − 219.
    [34]
    SUN K, ZHANG J, GAO Y, et al. Laboratory experimental study of ocean waves propagating over a partially buried pipeline in a trench layer [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 173(2): 617 − 627.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (255) PDF downloads (70) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return