采用受拉可调控隔震支座的高层隔震结构抗震性能研究

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF ISOLATED STRUCTURE USING TENSION- ADJUSTABLE RUBBER ISOLATORS

  • 摘要: 采用橡胶隔震支座的高层隔震结构在强地震作用下往往面临支座受拉控制难题,该研究提出一种受拉可调控橡胶隔震支座,由传统橡胶隔震支座串联受拉调控装置(摩擦阻尼器)组成。地震作用下,支座所受拉力达到预设拉力时,摩擦阻尼器启滑,出力基本保持不变,即传递给橡胶支座的拉力基本恒定,从而实现支座所受拉应力可控不超过1 MPa。同时摩擦阻尼器带来的承载力和耗能能力可以一定程度控制支座整体的竖向位移。为验证这一新型支座的可行性,该研究考虑高宽比影响,设计了高宽比分别为2.2和2.7的两个高层隔震结构案例,对比分析了采用传统、提离和受拉可调控橡胶隔震支座后的支座响应和上部结构地震响应。结果表明:受拉可调控橡胶隔震支座可实现预期的拉应力调控目标,使得传统隔震支座中的超限拉应力得到有效控制;受拉可调控橡胶隔震支座竖向位移大于传统橡胶支座,但大幅小于提离隔震支座,降幅达48%;受拉可调控支座隔震结构的层间位移角大于传统支座隔震结构,约6.5%,但小于提离支座隔震结构,且随着结构高宽比的增大该现象而更为显著;对于隔震层位移和楼面绝对加速度,采用传统、提离和调控支座的隔震结构的相对误差在3%以内,差别基本可以忽略。

     

    Abstract: The control of tensile force of rubber isolators is critical in high-rise isolated structures. This study proposes a novel tension-adjustable isolator, which is composed of conventional rubber isolator and tension adjustment device (friction damper) connected in series. Under the earthquake, when the tensile force of isolators reaches the preset value, the friction damper starts to slide and provides a friction force which essentially remains constant, thus achieving a basically constant and controllable tensile stress no more than 1 MPa and transmitting it to the rubber isolator. The load-carrying capacity and energy-dissipation capability of the friction damper can to some extent control the vertical displacement of the isolator. To investigate the influence of the building’s aspect ratio on the tensile stress of isolators, two high-rise seismically isolated structures with aspect ratios of 2.2 and 2.7 were designed. The tensile stresses of isolators and seismic responses of structures adopting conventional, uplift, and tension-adjustable isolators were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that the tension-adjustable isolator achieves the expected control target. The excessive tensile stress in the isolated structure using conventional rubber isolators is effectively controlled after adopting the tension-adjustable isolators. The vertical displacement of the tension-adjustable isolators is larger than that of the conventional rubber isolators, but significantly less than that of the uplift isolators, with a reduction ratio up to 48%. The inter-story drift ratio of the structure using tension-adjustable isolators is approximately 6.5% larger than that of the structure using conventional isolators, but smaller than that of the structure adopting uplift isolators. This phenomenon becomes more significant with the increase of the aspect ratio. For the isolation system displacement and absolute floor acceleration, the relative differences of the isolated structures using conventional, uplift and tension-adjustable isolators are within 3%, which can be basically neglected.

     

/

返回文章
返回