Engineering Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 104-113.doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.12.0918

Previous Articles     Next Articles

DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A SACRIFICIAL-ENERGY DISSIPATION OUTRIGGER

ZHU Ya-ning1, LIN Kai-qi2, JIANG Qing1, LIN Yuan-qing3, YANG Qing-shun4, LU Xin-zheng5   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
    2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Steel and Concrete Composite Structures, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    3. China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Branch, Zhengzhou 450052, China;
    4. School of Civil Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China;
    5. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2017-12-07 Revised:2018-03-09 Online:2019-02-22 Published:2019-02-22

Abstract: Outriggers are key lateral force resisting members in super-tall buildings. A frame-core tube-outrigger super-tall building is chosen as the research object. The super-tall building is firstly designed through adopting conventional outriggers and buckling-restrained-brace (BRB) outriggers. Two schemes are derived after the structural design, designated as a conventional outrigger structure (CO) and a BRB outrigger structure (BO). By conducting the nonlinear time-history analyses of the two structures at maximum considered earthquake (MCE) level, it is found that the outriggers in building BO maintain high strength, which in return increases the relative ratio of dissipated inelastic energy in other structural components. Consequently, the BRB outriggers in building BO dissipate less energy than the conventional outriggers in building CO. In this study, a novel sacrificial-energy dissipation (SED) outrigger is proposed to increase the energy dissipating capacity of outriggers. The main design parameters and aseismic performance of the proposed outrigger are analyzed through both experimental studies and numerical simulations. The results indicate that the optimum strength ratio between the sacrificial part and the energy dissipating part of the SED outrigger is about 6:4. Through substituting the outriggers in both building CO and BO with the novel SED outriggers considering the principle of equal stiffness and equal strength, the new SED outrigger structures present more rational energy dissipation modes. The dissipated inelastic energy of outriggers increases significantly while that of the shear walls and other structural components decreases. Therefore, the novel SED outrigger is able to protect other structural components of super-tall buildings under MCEs.

Key words: super-tall buildings, seismic analysis, conventional outrigger, BRB outrigger, sacrificial-energy dissipation outrigger, dissipated inelastic energy

CLC Number: 

  • TU973.2
[1] 丁洁民, 吴宏磊, 赵昕. 我国高度250 m以上超高层建筑结构现状与分析进展[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(3):1-7. Ding Jiemin, Wu Honglei, Zhao Xin. Current situation and discussion of structural design for super high-rise buildings above 250 m in China[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(3):1-7. (in Chinese)
[2] 程骥. 框架-核心筒-伸臂桁架结构体系受力性能研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2012. Cheng Ji. Research on the mechanical properties of frame-core-outrigger structural system[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
[3] 吕西林, 程明. 超高层建筑结构体系的新发展[J]. 结构工程师, 2008, 24(2):99-106. Lü Xilin, Cheng Ming. Recent development of structural systems for super tall buildings[J]. Structural Engineers, 2008, 24(2):99-106. (in Chinese)
[4] 邢丽丽, 周颖. 普通伸臂桁架与屈曲约束支撑型伸臂桁架最优布置方案分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(12):1-10. Xing Lili, Zhou Ying. Optimization analysis of ordinary outrigger trusses and outrigger trusses with buckling restrained braces[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(12):1-10. (in Chinese)
[5] 赵宪忠, 王斌, 陈以一, 等. 上海中心大厦伸臂桁架与巨柱和核心筒连接的静力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(2):20-28. Zhao Xianzhong, Wang Bin, Chen Yiyi, et al. Monotonic static tests on outrigger truss and its connection with mega column and core tube of the Shanghai Tower[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(2):20-28. (in Chinese)
[6] 陈以一, 王斌, 赵宪忠, 等. 上海中心大厦伸臂桁架与巨柱和核心筒连接的抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(2):29-36. Chen Yiyi, Wang Bin, Zhao Xianzhong, et al. Hysteretic tests on outrigger truss and its connection with mega column and core tube of the Shanghai Tower[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(2):29-36. (in Chinese)
[7] 聂建国, 丁然, 樊健生, 等. 武汉中心伸臂桁架-核心筒剪力墙节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(9):1-12. Nie Jianguo, Ding Ran, Fan Jiansheng, et al. Experimental research on seismic behavior of outrigger truss-wall joint in super high-rise building of Wuhan Center[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(9):1-12. (in Chinese)
[8] 严鹏, 王伟, 陈以一. 钢管混凝土柱与伸臂桁架连接节点试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(增刊):78-82. Yan Peng, Wang Wei, Chen Yiyi. Experimental study on concrete filled steel tube column to outrigger truss connection[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(Suppl):78-82. (in Chinese)
[9] 杨青顺. 耗能伸臂桁架试验及设计方法研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2017. Yang Qingshun. Experimental and design method study of energy dissipating outriggers[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[10] 卢啸. 超高巨柱-核心筒-伸臂结构地震灾变及抗震性能研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2013. Lu Xiao. Study on the collapse simulation and seismic performance of super tall mega column-core tube-outrigger buildings[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[11] 陆新征, 卢啸, 李梦珂, 等. 上海中心大厦结构抗震分析简化模型及地震耗能分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(7):1-10. Lu Xinzheng, Lu Xiao, Li Mengke, et al. Study on simplified modeling and energy dissipation distribution of the Shanghai Tower[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(7):1-10. (in Chinese)
[12] Fan H, Li Q S, Tuan A Y, et al. Seismic analysis of the world's tallest building[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(5):1206-1215.
[13] Li Q S, Wu J R. Correlation of dynamic characteristics of a super-tall building from full scale measurements and numerical analysis with various finite element models[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2004, 33(14):1311-1336.
[14] Jiang H J, Lu X L, Liu X J, et al. Performance-based seismic design principles and structural analysis of Shanghai Tower[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2014, 17(4):513-528.
[15] Moehle J. Seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill Education, 2015:755-758.
[16] JGJ 3-2010, 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. JGJ 3-2010, Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[17] GB 50011-2010, 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB 50011-2010, Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[18] 陆文忠, 吕西林. 武汉人信汇高位裙房双塔超限高层抗震分析和性能化设计[J]. 建筑结构, 2016, 46(6):12-19. Lu Wenzhong, Lü Xilin. Seismic analysis and performance-based design of a tall twin-tower beyond code limits with high-rise podium for Wuhan Ren Xin Hui[J]. Building Structure, 2016, 46(6):12-19. (in Chinese)
[19] Poon D, Hsiao L, Zhu Y, et al. Non-linear time history analysis for the performance based design of Shanghai Tower[C]//Structures Congress:Las Vegas. Reston. Virginia:ASCE, 2011:541-551.
[20] PEER Center. PEER ground motion database[DB/OL]. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/, 2018-06-20.
[21] GB 50017-2003, 钢结构设计规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2003. GB 50017-2003, Code for design of steel structures[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[22] FEMA 356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[R]. Washington D C:Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
[23] 杨青顺, 甄伟, 解琳琳, 等. 耗能伸臂桁架抗震性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(10):76-85. Yang Qingshun, Zhen Wei, Xie Linlin, et al. Experimental study on the seismic performance of energy dissipation outriggers[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(10):76-85. (in Chinese)
[24] 赖寒, 何志军, 丁洁民. 上海中心大厦考虑施工过程的竖向变形及差异分析与研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2011, 27(6):14-21. Lai Han, He Zhijun, Ding Jiemin. Analysis and research of vertical deformation difference of Shanghai Tower considering construction process[J]. Structural Engineers, 2011, 27(6):14-21. (in Chinese)
[25] 董志君, 滕军, 郭伟亮. 深圳京基金融中心的施工过程力学性能分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010(增刊1):409-412. Dong Zhijun, Teng Jun, Guo Weiliang. Staged construction analysis and application of mechanical performance on Jingji Commercial Centre[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010(Suppl1):409-412. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG Li-hong, HU Xiao, ZENG Di, ZHOU De-cai, MAO Yu, LÜ Wei. Research on selection of high voltage side valve hall in high seismic intensity area based on seismic performance [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(S1): 320-324.
[2] YI Jiang, MO Jin-sheng, LI Jian-zhong. STUDY ON CABLE RELAXATION OF SIGNLE-TOWER CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE DUE TO STRONG EARTHQUAKES [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(6): 97-104,114.
[3] HOU Gang-ling, LI Zhen, JIA Xiao-fei, SONG Tian-shu. OPTIMAL ISOLATED MODELS OF STORAGE TANKS AND ITS INFLUENTIAL FACTORS ANALYSIS [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(增刊): 312-319.
[4] WU Qing-xiong,HUANG Yu-fan,CHEN Bao-chun. SHAKING TABLES TESTING STUDY OF LIGHTWEIGHT BRIDGE WITH CFST COMPOSITE TRUSS GIRDER AND LATTICE PIER [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(9): 89-96.
[5] HUANG Fu-yun, LI Jiang-zhong, CHEN Bao-chun, WU Qing-xiong. SHAKING TABLES TESTING OF CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBULAR ARC RIB MODEL [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(4): 82-92.
[6] ZHANG Hai-shun,JIANG Xin-liang,ZHANG Ya-nan. SEISMIC ANALYSIS ON THE VIADUCT-SUBWAY STATION-PILE-SOIL COMPLEX STRUCTURE SYSTEM [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(增刊): 53-58.
[7] LI Xi, ZHANG De-yi, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Yan-jiang. OPERATIONAL MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND CALIBRATION OF CFST ARCH BRIDGE BASED ON AMBIENT EXCITATION [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(9): 81-88.
[8] YAN Wei-ming,LI Xi,CHEN Yan-jiang,LI Yong,GU Da-peng. SHAKING TABLE RESEARCH ON A CFST ARCH BRIDGE MODEL: EFFECT OF SITE CONDITION [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(6): 116-123.
[9] LIU Jing-bo,WANG Wen-hui,ZHAO Dong-dong. COMPARISON OF THE PSEUDO-STATIC METHODS FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 105-111.
[10] HE Guang-ling;ZHOU Yong;LI Jie. SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF WIND TURBINE SYSTEM [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(7): 72-077.
[11] . STUDY ON APPLICABILITY OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS METHOD FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(1): 49-057.
[12] WEI Han;Wang Ke-hai;LI Qian. RESEARCH ON BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(增刊Ⅰ): 0-202,.
[13] DING Yang;LIN Wei;LI Zhong-xian. NON-STATIONARY RANDOM SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN SPATIAL STRUCTURES UNDER MULTI-SUPPORT AND MULTI-DIMENSIONAL EARTHQUAKE EXCITATIONS [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(3): 0-103.
[14] SU Liang;DONG Shi-lin. SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF TWO TYPICAL SPATAL STRUCTURES UNDER MULTI-SUPPORT VERTICAL EXCITATIONS [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(2): 0-090.
[15] LI Jian-bo;CHEN Jian-yun;LIN Gao. A REFINED SUB-REGIONAL RECIPROCAL METHOD IN TIME DOMAIN FOR DYNAMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(3): 88-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!