工程力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 62-69.doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.01.0091

• 土木工程学科 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市轨道交通钢桥疲劳损伤等效系数研究

王春生1, 徐有良1, 赵会东2, 张培杰1   

  1. 1. 长安大学公路学院, 陕西, 西安 710064;
    2. 中国铁路总公司工程设计鉴定中心, 北京 100844
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-11 修回日期:2019-06-19 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 王春生(1972-),男,黑龙江人,教授,博士,博导,主要从事钢与组合结构桥梁、桥梁疲劳断裂、桥梁维护与检测评估新技术等方面研究(E-mail:wcs2000wcs@163.com). E-mail:wcs2000wcs@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐有良(1993-),男,河南人,硕士生,主要从事钢桥与组合结构桥梁等方面研究(E-mail:2016121100@chd.edu.cn);赵会东(1972-),男,河北人,教授级高工,博士,主要从事铁路桥梁设计咨询与技术研发等方面研究(E-mail:Qszhd@163.com);张培杰(1990-),男,陕西人,博士生,主要从事桥梁疲劳与断裂和既有桥梁使用安全评估等方面研究(E-mail:zhangpj_yy@163.com).
  • 基金资助:
    中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司科研开发项目(院科15-11);国家“万人计划”科技创新领军人才支持项目(W03020659).

STUDY OF DAMAGE EQUIVALENT FACTORS OF URBAN RAIL TRANSIT STEEL BRIDGE

WANG Chun-sheng1, XU You-liang1, ZHAO Hui-dong2, ZHANG Pei-jie1   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China;
    2. China Railway Economic and Planning Research Institute, Beijing 100844, China
  • Received:2019-03-11 Revised:2019-06-19 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-01-19

摘要: 为研究城市轨道交通钢桥疲劳损伤等效系数,根据Eurocode中S-N曲线和损伤等效系数法,对中国城市轨道交通钢桥疲劳损伤等效系数进行求解分析。提出6种适用于中国城市轨道交通钢桥的列车编组,选取ZC、ZK和LM71这3种荷载图式作为疲劳荷载模型。根据中国城市轨道交通的实际交通量,提出1种采用双斜率S-N曲线的简化算法,与采用单斜率S-N曲线求解方法进行对比分析。求解分析各项疲劳损伤等效系数,并针对中国城市轨道交通钢桥列车编组的特点提出考虑列车最大容许速度影响的损伤等效系数λv。结果表明:以ZC图式作为疲劳荷载模型,考虑列车最大容许速度的影响,依据双斜率S-N曲线简化算法求得的损伤等效系数较能合理地对中国轨道交通钢桥进行疲劳验算。

关键词: 城市轨道交通钢桥, 损伤等效系数, 疲劳验算, 疲劳荷载模型, 列车最大容许速度

Abstract: To study the damage equivalent factors of urban rail transit steel bridge, the factors of Chinese urban rail transit steel bridge are analyzed based on the S-N curve and damage equivalent factor method in Eurocode. Six traffic types of urban rail transit applied to Chinese urban rail transit steel bridge are proposed, and three load diagrams, ZC, ZK and LM71, are selected as fatigue load models. According to the actual traffic volume of Chinese urban rail transit, a simplified calculation method using bi-linear S-N curve is proposed, which is compared with the methods using single slope S-N curve. Thus, damage equivalent factors of urban rail transit steel bridge are analyzed. To consider the characteristics of Chinese urban rail transit, an equivalent factor λv considering the maximum permitted vehicle speed is proposed. The results demonstrate that by taking diagram ZC as fatigue load model and considering influence of the maximum permitted vehicle speed, the damage equivalent factors based on the simplified bi-linear S-N calculation method can be reasonably applied to fatigue verification of Chinese urban rail transit steel bridge.

Key words: urban rail transit steel bridge, damage equivalent factors, fatigue verification, fatigue load models, maximum permitted vehicle speed

中图分类号: 

  • U441.4
[1] 谢伟平, 刘亨. 城市轨道交通"公轨合一"型高架桥车桥耦合振动分析[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(2):119-126. Xie Weiping, Liu Heng. Vehicle-bridge interaction analysis of a super bridge in urban railway system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(2):119-126. (in Chinese)
[2] 周尚猛, 李亚东. 国内外铁路桥梁规范抗疲劳设计方法分析[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2010(3):46-49. Zhou Shangmeng, Li Yadong. Analysis on fatigue design methods of domestic and international railway bridge design specifications[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2010(3):46-49. (in Chinese)
[3] GB 50157-2013, 地铁设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB 50157-2013, Code for design of metro[S]. Beijing:China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[4] GB 50490-2009, 城市轨道交通技术规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. GB 50490-2009, Technical code of urban rail transit[S]. Beijing:China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[5] TB 10091-2017, 铁路桥梁钢结构设计规范[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2017. TB 10091-2017, Code for design on steel structure of railway bridge[S]. Beijing:China Railway Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[6] EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010, Eurocode 1:Actions on structures-Part 2:Traffic loads on bridges[S]. London:The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee, 2010.
[7] EN 1993-1-9:2005/AC:2009, Eurocode 3:Design of steel structures-Part 1-9:Fatigue[S]. London:The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee, 2009.
[8] EN 1993-2:2006/AC:2009, Eurocode 3:Design of steel structures-Part 2:Steel bridge[S]. London:The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee, 2009.
[9] Walbridge S, Fischer V, Maddah N, et al. Simultaneous vehicle crossing effects on fatigue damage equivalence factors for north American roadway bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(12):1309-1318.
[10] Maddah N, Nussbaumer A. Analytical approach for improving damage equivalence factors[J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 59:838-847.
[11] Fall D, Petersson T. Fatigue assessment methods for bridges according to Eurocode:program development and comparative study of design methods[D]. Göteborg:Chalmers University of Technology, 2009.
[12] Croce P. Improvement of damage equivalence λ-factors for railway steel bridges[R]. Venice, Italy:IABSE Symposium, 2010(8):15-22.
[13] Croce P. Background to fatigue load models for Eurocode 1:Part 2 Traffic loads[J]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2001, 3(4):335-345.
[14] 朱太勇, 周广东, 张欢, 等. 钢箱梁正交异性桥面板疲劳评估全空间S-N曲线研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(11):210-217. Zhu Taiyong, Zhou Guangdong, Zhang Huan, et al. A full range S-N curve for fatigue evaluation of orthotropic bridge decks in steel box-girders[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(11):210-217. (in Chinese)
[15] TB/T 3466-2016, 铁路列车荷载图式[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2017. TB/T 3466-2016, Code for train load diagrams[S]. Beijing:China Railway Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[16] Yali J Kim, Yongcheng Ji. A new live load model for bridges carrying light rail transit[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 170:21-33.
[17] 王丽, 张玉玲. 新建重载铁路桥梁设计荷载标准的研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(3):103-109. Wang Li, Zhang Yuling. Study on the design load model for new heavy haul railway bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(3):103-109. (in Chinese)
[18] TB 10002-2017, 铁路桥涵设计规范[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社, 2017. TB 10002-2017, Code for design on railway bridge and culvert[S]. Beijing:China Railway Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[19] 中国城市轨道交通协会. 城市轨道交通2015年度统计和分析报告[R]. 北京:中国城市轨道交通协会信息, 2016. China Urban Rail Transit Association. The statistic and analysis report of urban rail transit 2015[R]. Beijing:China Urban Rail Transit Association Information, 2016. (in Chinese)
[1] 李游, 李传习, 陈卓异, 贺君, 邓扬. 基于监测数据的钢箱梁U肋细节疲劳可靠性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(2): 111-123.
[2] 张帅, 程晓辉, 王天麟. 非等向固结砂土极小应变刚度的超弹性模型[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(1): 145-151.
[3] 杨雅斌, 石广玉. 正交异性钢桥面板肋-面板焊缝疲劳验算的应力分析模型评估[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1): 98-105.
[4] 卜一之, 金通, 李俊, 张清华. 纵肋与横隔板交叉构造细节穿透型疲劳裂纹扩展特性及其加固方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(6): 211-218.
[5] 李慧乐, 夏禾. 基于车桥耦合随机振动分析的钢桥疲劳可靠度评估[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(2): 69-77.
[6] 董晓丽, 赵成刚, 张卫华. 考虑相变状态的较密实饱和砂土弹塑性模型[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(1): 51-57.
[7] 卫 星,强士中. 斜拉桥桥塔钢-混凝土结合段传力机理试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(1): 255-260,313.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
X

近日,本刊多次接到来电,称有不法网站冒充《工程力学》杂志官网,并向投稿人收取高额费用。在此,我们郑重申明:

1.《工程力学》官方网站是本刊唯一的投稿渠道(原网站已停用),《工程力学》所有刊载论文必须经本刊官方网站的在线投稿审稿系统完成评审。我们不接受邮件投稿,也不通过任何中介或编辑收费组稿。

2.《工程力学》在稿件符合投稿条件并接收后会发出接收通知,请作者在接到版面费或审稿费通知时,仔细检查收款人是否为“《工程力学》杂志社”,千万不要汇款给任何的个人账号。请广大读者、作者相互转告,广为宣传!如有疑问,请来电咨询:010-62788648。

感谢大家多年来对《工程力学》的支持与厚爱,欢迎继续关注我们!

《工程力学》杂志社

2018年11月15日