工程力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 124-133.doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2017.12.0927

• 土木工程学科 • 上一篇    下一篇

铁路正交异性桥面加劲肋-横隔板局部疲劳受力特性研究

施洲, 张勇, 杨仕力, 蒲黔辉   

  1. 西南交通大学桥梁工程系, 四川, 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-05 修回日期:2018-04-16 出版日期:2019-02-22 发布日期:2019-02-22
  • 通讯作者: 施洲(1979-),男,江苏人,副教授,博士,主要从事桥梁试验及桥梁性能评定研究(E-mail:zshi1979@swjtu.edu.cn). E-mail:zshi1979@swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张勇(1991-),男,山东人,硕士生,主要从事钢结构桥梁疲劳评估研究(E-mail:422714507@qq.com);杨仕力(1991-),男,四川人,博士生,主要从事桥梁结构动力学研究(E-mail:yangshiliswjtu@163.com);蒲黔辉(1965-),男,四川人,教授,博士,主要从事大跨度预应力混凝土桥结构行为的研究(E-mail:qhpu@vip.163.com).
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁路总公司科技开发计划重大项目(2017G006-A)

RESEARCH ON FATIGUE PERFORMANCE OF RIB-TO-DIAPHRAGM JOINT IN RAILWAY ORTHOTROPIC STEEL DECKS

SHI Zhou, ZHANG Yong, YANG Shi-li, PU Qian-hui   

  1. Department of Bridge Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-12-05 Revised:2018-04-16 Online:2019-02-22 Published:2019-02-22

摘要: 正交异性钢桥面因整体性好、承载力强等优势在铁路大跨度桁梁及箱梁斜拉桥、拱桥等桥型中应用越来越广泛,其疲劳特性与公路桥面具有显著的差异。针对铁路正交异性钢桥面加劲肋与横隔板连接处的疲劳敏感区,通过弹性支撑梁理论及闭口薄壁杆件理论分析其局部受力特征,提出了加劲肋疲劳敏感部位面内疲劳应力的解析公式,分析了解析公式中各疲劳影响因素的影响程度及作用机理。基于甬江特大桥——大跨度铁路斜拉桥的钢箱梁正交异性桥面设计了包含2个U肋及2个V肋的正交异性桥面疲劳试验模型,并进行了560万次疲劳加载。研究结果表明:解析公式与有限元分析、试验测试结果相符良好;试验模型测试结果能准确反映疲劳敏感点的应力情况,解析理论则能够反映疲劳敏感点应力的影响因素与规律;在铁路荷载下,加劲肋与横隔板的焊缝长度和加劲肋腹板倾角的增大能够有效降低加劲肋的疲劳应力幅;在铁路正交异性钢桥面板中面积相近、抗弯刚度相等的V肋比U肋具有更好的抗疲劳工作性能。

关键词: 大跨度铁路桥, 正交异性钢桥面板, U/V形加劲肋, 横隔板, 疲劳试验

Abstract: Orthotropic steel decks have been widely used in long-span truss girder and box girder cable-stayed bridges and arch bridges duo to their good integrity and high bearing capacity, while the fatigue characteristics of railway orthotropic steel deck are significantly different from those of highway bridges. According to the fatigue-prone details in rib-to-diaphragm joints of a railway steel bridge, the local stress properties were investigated by using elastic support beam theory and closed thin-walled bar theory. Furthermore, the analytic formula for calculating the fatigue stress of fatigue-prone details in the stiffener was presented. Then the influence degree and action mechanism of various fatigue factors included in analytic formula were also analyzed. Based on the orthotropic steel deck in Yongjiang Great Bridge, a large span railway cable-stayed bridge with steel box girders, a full-scale fatigue test model including 2 U-ribs and 2 V-ribs was designed, and 5.6 million cycles of fatigue test were performed. The results revealed that the analytic formula is in good agreement with finite element analysis and test results. The experiment model could accurately simulate the stress of the fatigue sensitive point in a practical structure, and analytic theory can reflect the influence factors and rules. The weld length of rib-to-diaphragm connections and the inclination of rib plate can effectively reduce the fatigue stress of a rib when exposed to train load. The V-rib has better anti-fatigue performance than the U-rib in a railway orthotropic steel deck when the area and the bending stiffness of two types of rib scheme keep the same.

Key words: long span railway bridge, orthotropic steel deck, U/V-rib, diaphragm, fatigue tests

中图分类号: 

  • U24
[1] Tsakopoulos P A, Fisher J W. Full-scale fatigue tests of steel orthotropic decks for the Williamsburg bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2003, 8(5):323-333.
[2] Wolchuk R. Lessons from weld cracks in orthotropic decks on three European bridges[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990, 116(1):75-84.
[3] Zhang Q, Cui C, Bu Y, et al. Fatigue tests and fatigue assessment approaches for rib-to-diaphragm in steel orthotropic decks[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 114:110-118.
[4] 王春生, 付炳宁, 张芹, 等. 正交异性钢桥面板足尺疲劳试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26(2):69-76. Wang Chunsheng, Fu Bingning, Zhang Qin, et al. Fatigue test on full-scale orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(2):69-76. (in Chinese)
[5] Farreras-Alcover I, Chryssanthopoulos M K, Andersen J E. Data-based models for fatigue reliability of orthotropic steel bridge decks based on temperature, traffic and strain monitoring[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 95:104-119.
[6] 陈斌, 邵旭东, 曹君辉. 正交异性钢桥面疲劳开裂研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(12):170-174. Chen Bin, Shao Xudong, Cao Junhui. Study of fatigue cracking for orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(12):170-174. (in Chinese)
[7] 曾志斌. 正交异性钢桥面板典型疲劳裂纹分类及其原因分析[J]. 钢结构, 2011, 26(2):9-15. Zeng Zhibin. Classification and reasons of typical fatigue cracks in orthotropic steel deck[J]. Steel Construction, 2011, 26(2):9-15. (in Chinese)
[8] 张清华, 卜一之, 李乔. 正交异性钢桥面板疲劳问题的研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(3):14-30, 39. Zhang Qinghua, Bu Yizhi, Li Qiao. Review on fatigue problems of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3):14-30, 39. (in Chinese)
[9] Miki C. Fatigue damage in orthotropic steel bridge decks and retrofit works[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2006, 6(4):255-267.
[10] Li M, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto K, et al. Experimental study on fatigue resistance of rib-to-deck joint in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 23(2):1-10.
[11] Aygül M, Al-Emrani M, Urushadze S. Modelling and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic bridge deck details using FEM[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 40(7):129-142.
[12] 叶华文, 徐勋, 强士中, 等. 开口肋正交异性钢桥面疲劳设计参数研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2012, 47(3):379-386. Ye Huawen, Xu Xun, Qiang Shizhong, et al. Fatigue design parameters for orthotropic steel decks of single plane cable-stayed bridges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 47(3):379-386. (in Chinese)
[13] 朱太勇, 周广东, 张欢, 等. 钢箱梁正交异性桥面板疲劳评估全空间S-N曲线研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(11):210-217. Zhu Taiyong, Zhou Guangdong, Zhang Huan, et al. A full range S-N curve for fatigue evaluation of orthotropic bridge decks in steel box-girders[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(11):210-217. (in Chinese)
[14] 袁周致远, 吉伯海, 杨沐野, 等. 正交异性钢桥面板顶板竖向加劲肋焊接接头疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(2):69-76. Yuanzhou Zhiyuan, Ji Bohai, Yang Muye, et al. Study on fatigue performance of welded joints for out-of-plane gusset in orthotropic steel bridge decks[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(2):69-76. (in Chinese)
[15] 陶晓燕. 正交异性钢桥面板节段模型疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2013, 34(4):22-26. Tao Xiaoyan. Experimental study on the fatigue performance of the section model of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Railway Science, 2013, 34(4):22-26. (in Chinese)
[16] 高立强. 铁路桥钢箱梁正交异性桥面板的静力行为与疲劳性能研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2013:1-178. Gao Liqiang. Study on static structural behavior and fatigue performance of orthotropic deck of steel box girder for railway bridge[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013:1-178. (in Chinese)
[17] 李国跃, 吕凤梧. 双肢缀板钢格构立柱的整体稳定分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2002(4):17-19, 35. Li Guoyue, Lü Fengwu. The overall stability of a battened plate column[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2002(4):17-19, 35. (in Chinese)
[18] 李翠娟, 卫星, 强士中. 平行四边形闭口薄壁杆件的空间力学行为[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2010, 45(3):351-356. Li Cuijuan, Wei Xing, Qiang Shizhong. Spatial mechanical behavior of thin-walled members with parallelogram closed cross section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 45(3):351-356. (in Chinese)
[19] 胡启平, 涂佳黄, 梁经群. 组合断面薄壁杆件弯扭耦合分析[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(7):52-55. Hu Qiping, Xu Jiahuang, Liang Jingqun. Bending torsion coupling analysis of the composite section thin-walled bar structure[J]. Engineering Mechanics. 2010, 27(7):52-55. (in Chinese)
[20] 刘建廷. 公铁两用斜拉桥斜桁平行四边形闭口截面弦杆受力机理研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2014, 44(1):50-55. Liu Jianting. Study of mechanical mechanism of parallelogram closed section chords of inclined truss of rail-cum-road cable-stayed bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(1):50-55. (in Chinese))
[21] Chan H C, Kuang J S. Torsional behaviour of braced thin-walled open sections[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 1988, 6(4):343-354.
[22] Mackenzie D, Boyle J T. A simple pipe bend element for piping flexibility analysis[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1992, 51(1):85-106.
[23] 黄永辉, 王荣辉, 甘泉. 钢桁梁桥整体节点焊接残余应力试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2011, 24(1):83-88. Huang Yonghui, Wang Ronghui, Gan Quan. Welding residual stress test of steel truss bridge[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(1):83-88. (in Chinese)
[24] 强斌, 李亚东, 顾颖, 等. 钢桥对接焊缝残余应力及变形场数值分析与试验验证[J]. 铁道学报, 2017, 39(9):134-139. Qiang Bin, Li Yadong, Gu Ying, et al. Numerical analysis and test verification of residual stress and deformation field of bridge butt weld[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(9):134-139. (in Chinese)
[1] 王综轶, ZHANG Yun-feng, 王元清, 杜新喜, 袁焕鑫. 交通信号支撑结构疲劳裂纹扩展有限元分析[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(9): 180-187.
[2] 尹涛, 蔡力勋, 陈辉, 姚迪. TA17合金薄片材料毫小试样疲劳性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(11): 206-215.
[3] 崔圣华, 裴向军, 黄润秋, 孟祥瑞, 朱凌. 团块缺陷结构对岩石静动力学特性影响的数值模拟分析[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(1): 88-97.
[4] 罗征, 王银辉, 袁伟东, 胡晓佳. SRC组合加固铰缝疲劳性能试验[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(增刊): 161-167.
[5] 张宸赫, 廖红建, 钱春宇, 李杭州, 宋丽, 郑建国. 古建筑木材料拉-压疲劳试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(增刊): 201-206.
[6] 王高新, 丁幼亮, 宋永生, 韦征. 温度作用对带铺装层钢桥面板疲劳效应的影响研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(5): 115-123.
[7] 张耀庭, 赵璧归, 李瑞鸽, 杜晓菊. HRB400钢筋单调拉伸及低周疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(4): 121-129.
[8] 陶佳跃, 周亚东, 张培伟, 费庆国. 钛合金高温疲劳性能的试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(4): 250-256.
[9] 贺小帆, 刘文珽, 孙彦鹏, 王向明. 带中心孔的钛合金扩散连接层合板裂纹扩展特性[J]. 工程力学, 2015, 32(4): 244-249.
[10] 李涛, 陈泉, 王春林, 吴京. 屈曲约束支撑端部塑性扭转屈曲试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(3): 168-172.
[11] 宋永生,丁幼亮,王晓晶,李爱群,李万恒,闫昕. 运营状态下悬索桥钢桥面板疲劳效应监测与分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(11): 94-100.
[12] 张春涛,范文亮,李正良. 腐蚀方式对Q345等边角钢疲劳性能的影响[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(10): 211-218.
[13] 周志刚, 袁秀湘. 加筋沥青路面APA试验及其非线性疲劳损伤分析[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(9): 166-176.
[14] 陈 斌 邵旭东 曹君辉. 正交异性钢桥面疲劳开裂研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(12): 170-174.
[15] 杨 勇;刘玉擎;范海丰. FRP-混凝土组合桥面板疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(6): 66-073.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
X

近日,本刊多次接到来电,称有不法网站冒充《工程力学》杂志官网,并向投稿人收取高额费用。在此,我们郑重申明:

1.《工程力学》官方网站是本刊唯一的投稿渠道(原网站已停用),《工程力学》所有刊载论文必须经本刊官方网站的在线投稿审稿系统完成评审。我们不接受邮件投稿,也不通过任何中介或编辑收费组稿。

2.《工程力学》在稿件符合投稿条件并接收后会发出接收通知,请作者在接到版面费或审稿费通知时,仔细检查收款人是否为“《工程力学》杂志社”,千万不要汇款给任何的个人账号。请广大读者、作者相互转告,广为宣传!如有疑问,请来电咨询:010-62788648。

感谢大家多年来对《工程力学》的支持与厚爱,欢迎继续关注我们!

《工程力学》杂志社

2018年11月15日