周生通, 李鸿光. 考虑相关性的Rackwitz-Fiessler随机空间变换方法[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(10): 47-55,61. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.04.0353
引用本文: 周生通, 李鸿光. 考虑相关性的Rackwitz-Fiessler随机空间变换方法[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(10): 47-55,61. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.04.0353
ZHOU Sheng-tong, LI Hong-guang. THE RACKWITZ-FIESSLER RANDOM SPACE TRANSFORMATION METHOD WITH VARIABLE DEPENDENCE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(10): 47-55,61. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.04.0353
Citation: ZHOU Sheng-tong, LI Hong-guang. THE RACKWITZ-FIESSLER RANDOM SPACE TRANSFORMATION METHOD WITH VARIABLE DEPENDENCE[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(10): 47-55,61. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.04.0353

考虑相关性的Rackwitz-Fiessler随机空间变换方法

THE RACKWITZ-FIESSLER RANDOM SPACE TRANSFORMATION METHOD WITH VARIABLE DEPENDENCE

  • 摘要: 从新的角度对传统Rackwitz-Fiessler随机空间变换方法(R-F法)进行了多方位的阐释。首先,给出传统R-F法的描述并从几何角度分析R-F法与等概率变换的关系;然后,证明R-F法的正变换过程符合等概率变换而逆变换过程却不符合,但却可看作等概率变换的一次近似;其次,提出一种等价的R-F条件,为清晰的阐释R-F法中变量相关性的变化情况提供新思路;之后,指出R-F法的变量相关性变化情况同Nataf-Pearson方法(N-P法)一致;最后,比较考虑相关性变化的R-F法和N-P法的计算量,指出两者在单个迭代步中计算量基本一致且可通过算法优化实现;另外对R-F法与线性N-P法的也作了比较。算例表明:正确考虑相关性变化的R-F法可以得到同N-P法一致的结果。

     

    Abstract: New insights into the classic Rackwitz-Fiessler random space transformation method (R-F method) are presented in this study. Following a general description of the R-F method, the geometrical relationships between the R-F method and the isoprobabilistc transformation are discussed. The forward transformation of the R-F method is then proved to follow the isoprobabilistic transformation principle, whereas its backward transformation can only be taken as a linear approximation of the isoprobabilistic transformation. Subsequently, an equivalent R-F condition is proposed, which helps to investigate the dependency variation of random variables in the R-F method. The dependence variation of the R-F method is later shown to be the same as that of the Nataf-Pearson method (N-P method). Finally, the calculation cost is compared between the dependence changed R-F method and the N-P method, finding the costs to be almost the same for each single-step iteration when optimized algorithms are used. Additionally, the differences between the dependence changed R-F method and the linearized N-P method are also discussed. Numerical examples show that the reliability index calculated using the dependence changed R-F method agrees well with that of the N-P method.

     

/

返回文章
返回