倪 敏, 苟小平, 王启智. 霍普金森杆冲击压缩单裂纹圆孔板的岩石动态断裂韧度试验方法[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(1): 365-372. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0424
引用本文: 倪 敏, 苟小平, 王启智. 霍普金森杆冲击压缩单裂纹圆孔板的岩石动态断裂韧度试验方法[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(1): 365-372. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0424
NI Min, GOU Xiao-ping, WANG Qi-zhi. TEST METHOD FOR ROCK DYNAMIC FRACTURE TOUGHNESS USING SINGLE CLEAVAGE DRILLED COMPRESSION SPECIMEN IMPACTED BY SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 365-372. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0424
Citation: NI Min, GOU Xiao-ping, WANG Qi-zhi. TEST METHOD FOR ROCK DYNAMIC FRACTURE TOUGHNESS USING SINGLE CLEAVAGE DRILLED COMPRESSION SPECIMEN IMPACTED BY SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 365-372. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.07.0424

霍普金森杆冲击压缩单裂纹圆孔板的岩石动态断裂韧度试验方法

TEST METHOD FOR ROCK DYNAMIC FRACTURE TOUGHNESS USING SINGLE CLEAVAGE DRILLED COMPRESSION SPECIMEN IMPACTED BY SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR

  • 摘要: 对压缩单裂纹圆孔板(single cleavage drilled compression——SCDC)砂岩试样,利用分离式霍普金森压杆(SHPB)冲击加载,进行了岩石张开型(I型)动态断裂实验。分别采用2种方法确定砂岩的动态断裂韧度,第1种方法是实验-数值法:由SHPB弹性杆上应变片获得作用在试件上的加载力,然后输入有限元分析程序求得试样裂尖动态应力强度因子,对应于裂尖起裂时刻的动态应力强度因子即为材料动态断裂韧度值;第2种方法是准静态法:将载荷峰值代入静态应力强度因子公式确定动态断裂韧度。2种方法的结果差异较大,对无量纲裂纹长度a/R= 0.64(A组)试样,准静态方法确定的断裂韧度值要比实验-数值法确定的断裂韧度值平均要小35%~62%;对无量纲裂纹长度a/R=1.61(B组)试样,准静态方法的计算结果比实验-数值法的计算结果平均要小72%~83%。从原理上讲,实验-数值法比准静态法能更合理地测定岩石的动态断裂韧度。

     

    Abstract: The opening-mode (mode-I) dynamic fracture experiment for a sandstone was performed by using single cleavage drilled compression (SCDC) specimens impacted by split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The dynamic fracture toughness of rock was determined by two methods respectively. The first one was the experimental-numerical method: the dynamic load history was obtained from recordings of strain gauges glued on the bars of SHPB, the load was inputted to the finite element analysis program to calculate the dynamic stress intensity factor at the crack tip of specimens, and the dynamic fracture toughness is the stress intensity factor at the time of dynamic fracture initiation; the second one was the quasi-static method: the maximum load was inputted to the formula of a static stress intensity factor to determine the dynamic fracture toughness. Large differences of results were found between the experimental-numerical method and the quasi-static method: for specimens with dimensionless crack length a/R=0.64 (group A), the results of the quasi-static method were smaller than the results of the experimental-numerical method by 35%~62%; for specimens with dimensionless crack length a/R=1.61 (group B), the results of the quasi-static method were smaller than the results of the experimental-numerical method by 72%~83%. In principle, the experimental-numerical method can be used to measure rock dynamic fracture toughness more reasonably than the quasi-static method.

     

/

返回文章
返回